PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FLKR vs. IXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FLKR vs. IXC

Last updated Aug 1, 2026
Documentation

FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) and IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLKR is a South Korea Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLKR returned 14.07%/yr vs 22.34%/yr for IXC. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FLKR charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IXC.

Performance

FLKR vs. IXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLKR achieves a 61.37% return, which is significantly higher than IXC's 34.71% return.

FLKR

1D
-2.28%
1M
-15.74%
6M
29.07%
YTD
61.37%
1Y
117.49%
3Y*
35.68%
5Y*
14.07%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
11.21%

IXC

1D
0.63%
1M
14.55%
6M
19.17%
YTD
34.71%
1Y
43.29%
3Y*
16.60%
5Y*
22.34%
10Y*
10.52%
ALL TIME*
8.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

FLKR

Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
$43.49M$47.84M$51.57M

IXC

iShares Global Energy ETF
$40.96M$62.51M$57.88M

FLKR vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF		61.37%91.91%-18.84%19.16%-27.50%-7.54%42.64%8.88%-21.30%3.00%
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF		34.71%13.98%1.95%3.92%48.51%40.88%-31.00%12.67%-14.85%4.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FLKR and IXC is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between FLKR and IXC has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FLKR vs. IXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
FLKR
IXC

Technology

51.7%

-

Industrials

16.2%

-

Financial Services

12.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%

-

Healthcare

3.4%

-

Basic Materials

2.9%

-

Communication Services

2.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.3%

-

Energy

0.7%
99.5%

Utilities

0.4%
0.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

FLKR
51.7%
IXC

-

Industrials

FLKR
16.2%
IXC

-

Financial Services

FLKR
12.5%
IXC

-

Consumer Cyclical

FLKR
7.4%
IXC

-

Healthcare

FLKR
3.4%
IXC

-

Basic Materials

FLKR
2.9%
IXC

-

Communication Services

FLKR
2.4%
IXC

-

Consumer Defensive

FLKR
2.3%
IXC

-

Energy

FLKR
0.7%
IXC
99.5%

Utilities

FLKR
0.4%
IXC
0.2%

Real Estate

FLKR

-

IXC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF

iShares Global Energy ETF

Often compared with FLKR:
FLKR vs. EWYFLKR vs. SCHDFLKR vs. FLJPFLKR vs. VOOFLKR vs. KORUFLKR vs. HFXIFLKR vs. FLXK.DE
Often compared with IXC:
IXC vs. XLEIXC vs. VDEIXC vs. IYEIXC vs. OIHIXC vs. IUES.LIXC vs. DDMIXC vs. PXE

Return for Risk

FLKR vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
FLKR
FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
IXC
IXC Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXC Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
IXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLKR vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

FLKRIXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.21
2.22

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.56
2.83

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.36

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

2.83

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.27

8.78

+3.50

FLKR vs. IXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLKR Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the IXC Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLKR and IXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLKR vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLKR drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKR and IXC.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FLKRIXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.06%

-67.88%

+17.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.17%

-15.36%

-18.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.17%

-19.06%

-15.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.97%

-24.93%

-23.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-64.16%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.42%

-3.05%

-25.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.96%

-17.42%

-4.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.61%

4.95%

+4.66%

Volatility

FLKR vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a higher volatility of 21.39% compared to iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) at 6.07%. This indicates that FLKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FLKRIXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.39%

6.07%

+15.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.33%

16.03%

+34.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.42%

19.61%

+33.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.16%

23.37%

+8.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.79%

26.82%

+2.97%

FLKR vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLKR has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IXC's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLKR vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison

FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, more than IXC's 2.82% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF		2.86%3.87%7.08%2.28%3.13%2.12%0.99%2.09%1.86%1.02%0.00%0.00%
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF		2.82%3.68%4.56%3.45%4.76%3.98%4.86%7.00%3.51%3.05%2.86%3.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

FLKR and IXC have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLKR has higher volatility (21.39%) compared to IXC (6.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLKR dropped -50.06% vs IXC's -67.88%.

On 5-year performance, IXC leads with 22.34% vs 14.07% for FLKR. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IXC has been the lower-risk option at 6.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IXC has performed better with a 22.34% return vs 14.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IXC.

FLKR has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 2.82% for IXC.

FLKR is categorized as South Korea Equities, while IXC is Energy Equities. FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while IXC tracks S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLKR and 0.40% for IXC.

IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLKR and IXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer