FLJP vs. BBJP
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP).
FLJP and BBJP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLJP is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. BBJP is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index. It was launched on Jun 15, 2018. Both FLJP and BBJP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FLJP vs. BBJP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLJP vs. BBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | 7.49% | 26.79% | 6.99% | 20.00% | -16.57% | 0.99% | 15.76% | 18.99% | -13.86% |
BBJP JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF | 7.19% | 26.55% | 7.47% | 20.65% | -17.24% | 1.21% | 15.42% | 18.85% | -13.92% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FLJP having a 7.49% return and BBJP slightly lower at 7.19%.
FLJP
- 1D
- 2.35%
- 1M
- -4.22%
- YTD
- 7.49%
- 6M
- 11.85%
- 1Y
- 33.62%
- 3Y*
- 17.62%
- 5Y*
- 7.52%
- 10Y*
- —
BBJP
- 1D
- 2.53%
- 1M
- -4.07%
- YTD
- 7.19%
- 6M
- 12.46%
- 1Y
- 33.37%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 7.52%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLJP vs. BBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLJP has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than BBJP's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FLJP vs. BBJP — Risk / Return Rank
FLJP
BBJP
FLJP vs. BBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLJP | BBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.59 | 1.53 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.24 | 2.17 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.30 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 2.40 | +0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.31 | 8.93 | +0.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLJP | BBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 1.53 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.42 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLJP and BBJP is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FLJP vs. BBJP - Dividend Comparison
FLJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, less than BBJP's 5.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | 4.79% | 5.15% | 4.56% | 3.00% | 1.92% | 2.40% | 1.51% | 2.26% | 1.50% | 0.10% |
BBJP JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF | 5.01% | 5.37% | 2.80% | 3.05% | 1.52% | 2.89% | 1.12% | 2.31% | 0.65% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FLJP vs. BBJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLJP drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, roughly equal to the maximum BBJP drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJP and BBJP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLJP | BBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.49% | -32.66% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.30% | -13.60% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.49% | -32.66% | +0.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.59% | -7.88% | +0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.48% | -8.61% | -0.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.50% | 3.66% | -0.16% |
Volatility
FLJP vs. BBJP - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) have volatilities of 8.84% and 8.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLJP | BBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.84% | 8.95% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.51% | 14.93% | -0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.28% | 21.97% | -0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 18.05% | -0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.77% | 18.27% | -0.50% |