PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLKR vs. FENY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLKR vs. FENY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLKR achieves a 67.20% return, which is significantly higher than FENY's 31.48% return.


FLKR

1D
0.49%
1M
-25.25%
6M
45.78%
YTD
67.20%
1Y
125.99%
3Y*
38.49%
5Y*
14.68%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.70%

FENY

1D
0.44%
1M
8.43%
6M
23.04%
YTD
31.48%
1Y
39.04%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
22.96%
10Y*
9.16%
ALL TIME*
5.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLKR vs. FENY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
67.20%91.91%-18.84%19.16%-27.50%-7.54%42.64%8.88%-21.30%3.00%
FENY
Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF
31.48%7.27%6.62%-0.04%62.94%55.62%-33.15%9.11%-19.99%6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FLKR and FENY is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.32

The correlation between FLKR and FENY shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLKR vs. FENY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLKR
FENY

Technology

53.7%

-

Industrials

15.6%
0.1%

Financial Services

12.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%

-

Healthcare

3.3%

-

Basic Materials

2.8%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%

-

Communication Services

1.8%

-

Energy

0.6%
99.6%

Utilities

0.4%
0.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

FLKR
53.7%
FENY

-

Industrials

FLKR
15.6%
FENY
0.1%

Financial Services

FLKR
12.3%
FENY

-

Consumer Cyclical

FLKR
7.2%
FENY

-

Healthcare

FLKR
3.3%
FENY

-

Basic Materials

FLKR
2.8%
FENY
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

FLKR
2.1%
FENY

-

Communication Services

FLKR
1.8%
FENY

-

Energy

FLKR
0.6%
FENY
99.6%

Utilities

FLKR
0.4%
FENY
0.1%

Real Estate

FLKR

-

FENY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLKR vs. FENY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLKR
FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FENY
FENY Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FENY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FENY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FENY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FENY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FENY Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLKR vs. FENY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLKRFENYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.31

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.84

2.62

+2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.43

7.08

+8.35

FLKR vs. FENY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLKR Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the FENY Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLKR and FENY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLKR vs. FENY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLKR drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, smaller than the maximum FENY drawdown of -74.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKR and FENY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLKRFENYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.06%

-74.35%

+24.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.19%

-14.96%

-11.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.39%

-21.47%

-4.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.97%

-26.64%

-21.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.83%

-6.92%

-18.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.94%

-23.00%

+1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.20%

5.53%

+2.67%

Volatility

FLKR vs. FENY - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a higher volatility of 22.88% compared to Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) at 5.94%. This indicates that FLKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FENY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLKRFENYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.88%

5.94%

+16.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.04%

16.41%

+31.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.00%

20.86%

+30.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.34%

26.25%

+5.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.32%

29.79%

-0.47%

FLKR vs. FENY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLKR has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than FENY's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLKR vs. FENY - Dividend Comparison

FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than FENY's 2.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FENY
Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF
2.42%3.18%3.05%3.33%3.33%3.69%4.60%6.43%3.21%2.94%2.29%3.05%
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
2.76%3.87%7.08%2.28%3.13%2.12%0.99%2.09%1.86%1.02%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLKR and FENY have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLKR has higher volatility (22.88%) compared to FENY (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLKR dropped -50.06% vs FENY's -74.35%.

On 5-year performance, FENY leads with 22.96% vs 14.68% for FLKR. On fees, FENY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FENY has been the lower-risk option at 5.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FENY has performed better with a 22.96% return vs 14.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FENY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for FLKR.

FLKR has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 2.42% for FENY.

FLKR is categorized as South Korea Equities, while FENY is Energy Equities. FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while FENY tracks MSCI USA IMI Energy 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLKR and 0.08% for FENY.

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLKR and FENY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer