PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FLKR vs. EUFN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FLKR vs. EUFN

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) and EUFN (iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLKR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while EUFN is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLKR returned 17.78%/yr vs 18.43%/yr for EUFN. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLKR charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for EUFN.

Performance

FLKR vs. EUFN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLKR achieves a 98.10% return, which is significantly higher than EUFN's 4.75% return.

FLKR

1D
-0.69%
1M
3.08%
YTD
98.10%
6M
113.45%
1Y
191.57%
3Y*
45.52%
5Y*
17.78%
10Y*
—

EUFN

1D
1.20%
1M
3.43%
YTD
4.75%
6M
9.10%
1Y
28.57%
3Y*
32.04%
5Y*
18.43%
10Y*
13.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLKR vs. EUFN - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF		98.10%91.91%-18.84%19.16%-27.50%-7.54%42.64%8.88%-21.30%3.00%
EUFN
iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF		4.75%65.73%17.20%26.15%-8.78%19.13%-8.55%20.73%-23.14%2.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FLKR and EUFN is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.57

The correlation between FLKR and EUFN shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLKR vs. EUFN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
FLKR
EUFN

Technology

64.3%
1.0%

Industrials

12.8%
0.4%

Financial Services

7.6%
97.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
0.2%

Basic Materials

2.6%

-

Healthcare

2.5%

-

Communication Services

1.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.5%

-

Energy

0.4%

-

Utilities

0.3%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

FLKR
64.3%
EUFN
1.0%

Industrials

FLKR
12.8%
EUFN
0.4%

Financial Services

FLKR
7.6%
EUFN
97.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FLKR
6.0%
EUFN
0.2%

Basic Materials

FLKR
2.6%
EUFN

-

Healthcare

FLKR
2.5%
EUFN

-

Communication Services

FLKR
1.6%
EUFN

-

Consumer Defensive

FLKR
1.5%
EUFN

-

Energy

FLKR
0.4%
EUFN

-

Utilities

FLKR
0.3%
EUFN

-

Real Estate

FLKR

-

EUFN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF

iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF

Often compared with FLKR:
FLKR vs. EWYFLKR vs. SCHDFLKR vs. FLJPFLKR vs. VOOFLKR vs. KORUFLKR vs. HFXIFLKR vs. FLTW
Often compared with EUFN:
EUFN vs. XLFEUFN vs. FDDEUFN vs. SPYEUFN vs. GSIBEUFN vs. EURLEUFN vs. IEUREUFN vs. EIRL

Return for Risk

FLKR vs. EUFN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FLKR
FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
EUFN
EUFN Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
EUFN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUFN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUFN Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
EUFN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUFN Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLKR vs. EUFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

FLKREUFNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
4.08
1.31

+2.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.94
1.92

+2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.23

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.11

1.79

+6.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.21

6.24

+21.97

FLKR vs. EUFN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLKR Sharpe Ratio is 4.08, which is higher than the EUFN Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLKR and EUFN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLKR vs. EUFN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLKR drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, smaller than the maximum EUFN drawdown of -53.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKR and EUFN.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FLKREUFNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.06%

-53.25%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.03%

-14.77%

-8.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.39%

-15.95%

-10.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.51%

-35.15%

-14.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-53.25%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.25%

-0.10%

-9.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.03%

-14.53%

-7.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.61%

4.23%

+2.38%

Volatility

FLKR vs. EUFN - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a higher volatility of 25.85% compared to iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) at 6.96%. This indicates that FLKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUFN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FLKREUFNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.85%

6.96%

+18.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.11%

17.05%

+25.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.82%

20.17%

+25.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.58%

21.88%

+7.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.37%

24.53%

+3.84%

FLKR vs. EUFN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLKR has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EUFN's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLKR vs. EUFN - Dividend Comparison

FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than EUFN's 3.41% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUFN
iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF		3.41%3.57%5.36%5.00%4.24%4.15%1.38%4.55%6.48%3.04%4.03%3.65%
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF		1.95%3.87%7.08%2.28%3.13%2.12%0.99%2.09%1.86%1.02%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

FLKR and EUFN have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLKR has higher volatility (25.85%) compared to EUFN (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLKR dropped -50.06% vs EUFN's -53.25%.

On 5-year performance, EUFN leads with 18.43% vs 17.78% for FLKR. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EUFN has been the lower-risk option at 6.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EUFN has performed better with a 18.43% return vs 17.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for EUFN.

EUFN has the higher dividend yield at 3.41%, compared with 1.95% for FLKR.

FLKR is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while EUFN is Financials Equities. FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while EUFN tracks MSCI Europe Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLKR and 0.48% for EUFN.

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.08 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLKR and EUFN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer