PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLKR vs. CGAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLKR vs. CGAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and Centerra Gold Inc (CGAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLKR achieves a 61.37% return, which is significantly higher than CGAU's 20.32% return.


FLKR

1D
-2.28%
1M
-15.74%
6M
29.07%
YTD
61.37%
1Y
117.49%
3Y*
35.68%
5Y*
14.07%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.21%

CGAU

1D
-6.17%
1M
10.62%
6M
3.16%
YTD
20.32%
1Y
157.08%
3Y*
46.41%
5Y*
18.80%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$26.01M$24.30M$25.95M
$43.49M$47.84M$51.57M

FLKR vs. CGAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
61.37%91.91%-18.84%19.16%-27.50%-14.88%
CGAU
Centerra Gold Inc
20.32%159.49%-1.45%19.37%-32.55%-14.48%

Correlation

The correlation between FLKR and CGAU is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2021

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLKR vs. CGAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLKR
FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

CGAU
CGAU Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CGAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGAU Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CGAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGAU Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLKR vs. CGAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and Centerra Gold Inc (CGAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLKRCGAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.40

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

5.36

-1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.27

12.46

-0.18

FLKR vs. CGAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLKR Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the CGAU Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLKR and CGAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLKR vs. CGAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLKR drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, smaller than the maximum CGAU drawdown of -63.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKR and CGAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLKRCGAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.06%

-63.47%

+13.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.17%

-29.50%

-4.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.17%

-29.50%

-4.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.97%

-63.47%

+15.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.42%

-17.78%

-10.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.96%

-29.41%

+7.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.61%

12.66%

-3.05%

Volatility

FLKR vs. CGAU - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a higher volatility of 21.39% compared to Centerra Gold Inc (CGAU) at 17.09%. This indicates that FLKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLKRCGAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.39%

17.09%

+4.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.33%

43.21%

+7.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.42%

53.61%

-0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.16%

47.52%

-15.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.79%

48.98%

-19.19%

Dividends

FLKR vs. CGAU - Dividend Comparison

FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, more than CGAU's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CGAU
Centerra Gold Inc
1.18%1.39%3.59%3.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
2.86%3.87%7.08%2.28%3.13%2.12%0.99%2.09%1.86%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLKR and CGAU have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLKR has higher volatility (21.39%) compared to CGAU (17.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLKR dropped -50.06% vs CGAU's -63.47%.

CGAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLKR and CGAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer