FLIN vs. VUG
FLIN (Franklin FTSE India ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLIN is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE India RIC Capped Index, while VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLIN returned 3.56%/yr vs 14.33%/yr for VUG. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLIN charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
FLIN vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLIN achieves a -12.18% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 6.14% return.
FLIN
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- -12.18%
- 6M
- -10.48%
- 1Y
- -13.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.55%
- 5Y*
- 3.56%
- 10Y*
- —
VUG
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- YTD
- 6.14%
- 6M
- 5.11%
- 1Y
- 23.11%
- 3Y*
- 24.71%
- 5Y*
- 14.33%
- 10Y*
- 17.95%
FLIN vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | -12.18% | 2.40% | 10.33% | 20.58% | -7.96% | 24.96% | 14.50% | 4.77% | -6.70% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 6.14% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -1.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLIN and VUG is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2018 | 0.45 |
FLIN vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLIN
VUG
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
FLIN
VUG
Consumer Cyclical
FLIN
VUG
Industrials
FLIN
VUG
Energy
FLIN
VUG
Basic Materials
FLIN
VUG
Technology
FLIN
VUG
Healthcare
FLIN
VUG
Consumer Defensive
FLIN
VUG
Utilities
FLIN
VUG
Communication Services
FLIN
VUG
Real Estate
FLIN
VUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLIN vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
FLIN
VUG
FLIN vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLIN | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.25 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 1.40 | -2.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.73 | 4.90 | -6.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLIN | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.90 | 1.43 | -2.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.65 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.61 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
FLIN vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLIN drawdown since its inception was -41.90%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLIN and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLIN | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.90% | -50.68% | +8.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.79% | -16.53% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.85% | -22.85% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.85% | -35.61% | +12.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.15% | -4.52% | -14.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.02% | -7.09% | -0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.73% | 4.73% | +3.00% |
Volatility
FLIN vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) have volatilities of 5.06% and 5.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLIN | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | 5.17% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.90% | 12.68% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.98% | 16.25% | -1.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.76% | 22.28% | -6.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 21.48% | -1.04% |
FLIN vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLIN has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLIN vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
FLIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, more than VUG's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | 0.64% | 0.56% | 1.58% | 0.73% | 0.73% | 2.26% | 0.68% | 0.90% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLIN and VUG have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VUG has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to FLIN (5.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLIN dropped -41.90% vs VUG's -50.68%.
On 5-year performance, VUG leads with 14.33% vs 3.56% for FLIN. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FLIN has been the lower-risk option at 5.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VUG has performed better with a 14.33% return vs 3.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLIN.
FLIN has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.38% for VUG.
FLIN is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. FLIN tracks FTSE India RIC Capped Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLIN and 0.03% for VUG.
VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLIN and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer