FLIN vs. ASEA
FLIN (Franklin FTSE India ETF) and ASEA (Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - FLIN tracks the FTSE India RIC Capped Index while ASEA tracks the FTSE/ASEAN 40 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLIN returned 3.56%/yr vs 9.70%/yr for ASEA. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLIN charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ASEA.
Performance
FLIN vs. ASEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLIN achieves a -11.92% return, which is significantly lower than ASEA's 9.50% return.
FLIN
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -2.58%
- YTD
- -11.92%
- 6M
- -10.85%
- 1Y
- -11.63%
- 3Y*
- 5.53%
- 5Y*
- 3.56%
- 10Y*
- —
ASEA
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 9.50%
- 6M
- 12.22%
- 1Y
- 26.01%
- 3Y*
- 14.54%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- 7.64%
FLIN vs. ASEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | -11.92% | 2.40% | 10.33% | 20.58% | -7.96% | 24.96% | 14.50% | 4.77% | -6.70% |
ASEA Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF | 9.50% | 19.80% | 9.82% | 4.88% | 5.24% | 4.66% | -7.88% | 8.34% | -8.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLIN and ASEA is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2018 | 0.50 |
The correlation between FLIN and ASEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FLIN vs. ASEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLIN
ASEA
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
-
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
FLIN
ASEA
Consumer Cyclical
FLIN
ASEA
-
Industrials
FLIN
ASEA
Energy
FLIN
ASEA
Basic Materials
FLIN
ASEA
Technology
FLIN
ASEA
-
Healthcare
FLIN
ASEA
Consumer Defensive
FLIN
ASEA
Utilities
FLIN
ASEA
Communication Services
FLIN
ASEA
Real Estate
FLIN
ASEA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLIN vs. ASEA — Risk / Return Rank
FLIN
ASEA
FLIN vs. ASEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) and Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLIN | ASEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.34 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 3.16 | -3.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | 8.72 | -10.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLIN | ASEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.78 | 1.87 | -2.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.67 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.27 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
FLIN vs. ASEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLIN drawdown since its inception was -41.90%, smaller than the maximum ASEA drawdown of -44.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLIN and ASEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLIN | ASEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.90% | -44.16% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.79% | -8.28% | -10.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.85% | -22.20% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.85% | -22.20% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.91% | -2.81% | -16.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.01% | -10.66% | +2.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.57% | 2.99% | +4.58% |
Volatility
FLIN vs. ASEA - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) at 3.40%. This indicates that FLIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLIN | ASEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 3.40% | +1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.81% | 11.20% | +1.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.92% | 14.01% | +0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.74% | 14.66% | +1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.45% | 17.59% | +2.86% |
FLIN vs. ASEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLIN has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ASEA's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLIN vs. ASEA - Dividend Comparison
FLIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than ASEA's 3.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASEA Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF | 3.61% | 3.95% | 3.61% | 3.76% | 2.23% | 4.19% | 2.27% | 2.51% | 3.08% | 1.59% | 2.78% | 3.64% |
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | 0.64% | 0.56% | 1.58% | 0.73% | 0.73% | 2.26% | 0.68% | 0.90% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLIN and ASEA have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLIN has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to ASEA (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLIN dropped -41.90% vs ASEA's -44.16%.
On 5-year performance, ASEA leads with 9.70% vs 3.56% for FLIN. On fees, FLIN is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ASEA has been the lower-risk option at 3.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ASEA has performed better with a 9.70% return vs 3.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLIN is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASEA.
ASEA has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 0.64% for FLIN.
FLIN tracks FTSE India RIC Capped Index, while ASEA tracks FTSE/ASEAN 40 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLIN and 0.65% for ASEA.
ASEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLIN and ASEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer