PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLIA vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLIA vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF (FLIA) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLIA achieves a 1.13% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 14.69% return.


FLIA

1D
0.10%
1M
0.83%
YTD
1.13%
6M
1.03%
1Y
2.27%
3Y*
3.60%
5Y*
0.91%
10Y*

AAPL

1D
0.31%
1M
9.62%
YTD
14.69%
6M
11.08%
1Y
54.06%
3Y*
20.68%
5Y*
20.46%
10Y*
30.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLIA vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLIA
Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF
1.13%2.12%2.42%7.17%-7.68%-1.98%1.37%7.58%-2.59%
AAPL
Apple Inc
14.69%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-16.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FLIA and AAPL is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2018

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLIA vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLIA
FLIA Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FLIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLIA Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FLIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLIA Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLIA vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF (FLIA) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLIAAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.44

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

3.94

-2.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.96

9.91

-6.95

FLIA vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLIA Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLIA and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLIAAAPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

2.44

-1.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.75

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.44

-0.21

Drawdowns

FLIA vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLIA drawdown since its inception was -11.24%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLIA and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLIAAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.24%

-81.80%

+70.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.04%

-13.80%

+11.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.77%

-33.36%

+30.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.42%

-33.36%

+23.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

-1.26%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-29.61%

+25.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

5.47%

-4.70%

Volatility

FLIA vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF (FLIA) is 1.18%, while Apple Inc (AAPL) has a volatility of 5.01%. This indicates that FLIA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLIAAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.18%

5.01%

-3.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.49%

15.88%

-13.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.34%

22.31%

-18.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.42%

27.45%

-23.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.71%

28.89%

-24.18%

Dividends

FLIA vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

FLIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than AAPL's 0.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.34%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
FLIA
Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF
2.69%2.62%2.97%0.93%18.12%2.26%0.43%2.93%1.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLIA and AAPL have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAPL has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to FLIA (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLIA dropped -11.24% vs AAPL's -81.80%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLIA and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer