FLGZY vs. DTM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLGZY (Flughafen Zürich AG) and DTM (DT Midstream, Inc.) are both stocks. FLGZY operates in Airports & Air Services (Industrials), while DTM operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 3 years, FLGZY returned 17.73%/yr vs 49.30%/yr for DTM. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FLGZY vs. DTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Flughafen Zürich AG (FLGZY) and DT Midstream, Inc. (DTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLGZY achieves a -1.94% return, which is significantly lower than DTM's 18.85% return.

FLGZY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 5.84%
• YTD: -1.94%
• 6M: 1.36%
• 1Y: 9.75%
• 3Y*: 17.73%
• 5Y*: 13.05%
• 10Y*: —

DTM

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -3.84%
• YTD: 18.85%
• 6M: 19.35%
• 1Y: 35.65%
• 3Y*: 49.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLGZY vs. DTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FLGZY Flughafen Zürich AG	-1.94%	28.53%	19.45%	37.18%	-13.41%	10.34%
DTM DT Midstream, Inc.	18.85%	24.13%	88.95%	4.71%	20.73%	17.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FLGZY and DTM is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021	0.06

Fundamentals

Market Cap FLGZY : $8.94B DTM : $14.51B
EPS FLGZY : $0.88 DTM : $4.55
PE Ratio FLGZY : 13.31 DTM : 31.06
PEG Ratio FLGZY : 2.30 DTM : 3.18
PS Ratio FLGZY : 3.33 DTM : 11.37
PB Ratio FLGZY : 2.84 DTM : 3.05
Total Revenue (TTM) FLGZY : $2.68B DTM : $1.28B
Gross Profit (TTM) FLGZY : $1.41B DTM : $810.00M
EBITDA (TTM) FLGZY : $1.49B DTM : $1.06B

Return for Risk

FLGZY vs. DTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLGZY

FLGZY Risk / Return Rank: 58
FLGZY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
FLGZY Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
FLGZY Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FLGZY Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
FLGZY Martin Ratio Rank: 57

DTM

DTM Risk / Return Rank: 83
DTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
DTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
DTM Omega Ratio Rank: 79
DTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
DTM Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLGZY vs. DTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flughafen Zürich AG (FLGZY) and DT Midstream, Inc. (DTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLGZY	DTM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.46	1.67	-1.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.88	2.37	-1.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.30	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.59	3.67	-3.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.60	9.04	-7.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLGZY vs. DTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLGZY Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the DTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLGZY and DTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLGZY	DTM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46	1.67	-1.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	1.31	-0.81

Drawdowns

FLGZY vs. DTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLGZY drawdown since its inception was -29.38%, which is greater than DTM's maximum drawdown of -23.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLGZY and DTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLGZY	DTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.38%	-23.56%	-5.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.51%	-9.77%	-6.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.51%	-23.56%	+7.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.64%	-6.48%	-5.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.43%	-5.99%	-1.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.12%	3.95%	+2.17%

Volatility

FLGZY vs. DTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Flughafen Zürich AG (FLGZY) is 5.40%, while DT Midstream, Inc. (DTM) has a volatility of 6.02%. This indicates that FLGZY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLGZY	DTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.40%	6.02%	-0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.31%	15.55%	+2.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.47%	21.50%	-0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.02%	25.56%	+2.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.61%	25.56%	+10.05%

Dividends

FLGZY vs. DTM - Dividend Comparison

FLGZY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than DTM's 2.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DTM DT Midstream, Inc.	2.36%	2.74%	2.96%	5.04%	4.63%	2.50%	0.00%
FLGZY Flughafen Zürich AG	3.65%	1.59%	1.82%	1.24%	0.00%	0.00%	1.06%

Financials

FLGZY vs. DTM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Flughafen Zürich AG and DT Midstream, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FLGZY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flughafen Zürich AG reported a gross profit of 288.60M and revenue of 714.45M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.4%.

DTM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DT Midstream, Inc. reported a gross profit of 251.00M and revenue of 336.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.7%.

FLGZY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flughafen Zürich AG reported an operating income of 266.38M and revenue of 714.45M, resulting in an operating margin of 37.3%.

DTM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DT Midstream, Inc. reported an operating income of 166.00M and revenue of 336.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.4%.

FLGZY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flughafen Zürich AG reported a net income of 183.67M and revenue of 714.45M, resulting in a net margin of 25.7%.

DTM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DT Midstream, Inc. reported a net income of 134.00M and revenue of 336.00M, resulting in a net margin of 39.9%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLGZY and DTM in my portfolio?

FLGZY and DTM have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLGZY or DTM?

DTM has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to FLGZY (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLGZY dropped -29.38% vs DTM's -23.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.