PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLGZY vs. ATMU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FLGZY vs. ATMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Flughafen Zürich AG (FLGZY) and Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLGZY achieves a -1.94% return, which is significantly higher than ATMU's -8.57% return.


FLGZY

1D
0.00%
1M
5.84%
YTD
-1.94%
6M
1.36%
1Y
9.75%
3Y*
17.73%
5Y*
13.05%
10Y*

ATMU

1D
0.25%
1M
-6.43%
YTD
-8.57%
6M
-10.31%
1Y
29.99%
3Y*
32.45%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLGZY vs. ATMU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FLGZY
Flughafen Zürich AG
-1.94%28.53%19.45%7.34%
ATMU
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.
-8.57%33.16%67.28%8.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FLGZY and ATMU is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2023

0.04

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FLGZY:

$8.94B

ATMU:

$3.88B

EPS

FLGZY:

$0.88

ATMU:

$2.56

PE Ratio

FLGZY:

13.31

ATMU:

18.52

PEG Ratio

FLGZY:

2.30

ATMU:

3.33

PS Ratio

FLGZY:

3.33

ATMU:

2.90

PB Ratio

FLGZY:

2.84

ATMU:

9.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

FLGZY:

$2.68B

ATMU:

$1.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FLGZY:

$1.41B

ATMU:

$529.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

FLGZY:

$1.49B

ATMU:

$334.60M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLGZY vs. ATMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLGZY
FLGZY Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FLGZY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGZY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGZY Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGZY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGZY Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

ATMU
ATMU Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ATMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATMU Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
ATMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATMU Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLGZY vs. ATMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flughafen Zürich AG (FLGZY) and Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLGZYATMUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.46

0.84

-0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.88

1.25

-0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.18

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.59

1.00

-0.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.60

3.65

-2.06

FLGZY vs. ATMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLGZY Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the ATMU Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLGZY and ATMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLGZYATMUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

0.84

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.88

-0.38

Drawdowns

FLGZY vs. ATMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLGZY drawdown since its inception was -29.38%, roughly equal to the maximum ATMU drawdown of -30.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLGZY and ATMU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLGZYATMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.38%

-30.22%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.51%

-30.22%

+13.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-30.22%

+13.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.64%

-27.68%

+16.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.43%

-8.51%

+1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.12%

8.23%

-2.11%

Volatility

FLGZY vs. ATMU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Flughafen Zürich AG (FLGZY) is 5.40%, while Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) has a volatility of 11.78%. This indicates that FLGZY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLGZYATMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

11.78%

-6.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.31%

30.46%

-12.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.47%

35.82%

-14.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.02%

34.42%

-6.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.61%

34.42%

+1.19%

Dividends

FLGZY vs. ATMU - Dividend Comparison

FLGZY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than ATMU's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ATMU
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.
0.46%0.40%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLGZY
Flughafen Zürich AG
3.65%1.59%1.82%1.24%0.00%0.00%1.06%

Financials

FLGZY vs. ATMU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flughafen Zürich AG and Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M202120222023202420252026
714.45M
0
(FLGZY) Total Revenue
(ATMU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FLGZY and ATMU have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATMU has higher volatility (11.78%) compared to FLGZY (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLGZY dropped -29.38% vs ATMU's -30.22%.

ATMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLGZY and ATMU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer