FLGV vs. FLKR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FLGV (Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLGV is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while FLKR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. FLGV is actively managed, while FLKR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLGV returned -0.15%/yr vs 18.41%/yr for FLKR. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.

Performance

FLGV vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLGV achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 104.96% return.

FLGV

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 0.16%
• 6M: 0.09%
• 1Y: 3.53%
• 3Y*: 2.94%
• 5Y*: -0.15%
• 10Y*: —

FLKR

• 1D: -4.41%
• 1M: 16.33%
• YTD: 104.96%
• 6M: 121.64%
• 1Y: 213.10%
• 3Y*: 48.97%
• 5Y*: 18.41%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLGV vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FLGV Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF	0.16%	6.22%	0.62%	4.18%	-11.53%	-2.39%	-0.27%
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	104.96%	91.91%	-18.84%	19.16%	-27.50%	-7.54%	55.11%

Correlation

The correlation between FLGV and FLKR is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2020	0.08

The correlation between FLGV and FLKR shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLGV vs. FLKR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLGV	FLKR
Communication Services	0.9%	1.6%
Basic Materials	-	2.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	6.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.5%
Energy	-	0.4%
Financial Services	-	7.6%
Healthcare	-	2.5%
Industrials	-	12.8%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	64.3%
Utilities	-	0.3%

Return for Risk

FLGV vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLGV

FLGV Risk / Return Rank: 27
FLGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
FLGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
FLGV Omega Ratio Rank: 25
FLGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FLGV Martin Ratio Rank: 27

FLKR

FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 96
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLGV vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLGV	FLKR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	5.18	-4.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	4.84	-3.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.67	-0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.26	9.32	-8.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.70	34.49	-30.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLGV vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLGV Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 5.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLGV and FLKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLGV	FLKR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96	5.18	-4.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03	0.65	-0.68
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.13	0.53	-0.66

Drawdowns

FLGV vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLGV drawdown since its inception was -17.63%, smaller than the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLGV and FLKR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLGV	FLKR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.63%	-50.06%	+32.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.82%	-23.03%	+20.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.23%	-26.39%	+21.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.26%	-49.51%	+34.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.45%	-6.10%	+0.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.73%	-22.06%	+13.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.96%	6.21%	-5.25%

Volatility

FLGV vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) is 1.19%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 20.38%. This indicates that FLGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLGV	FLKR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.19%	20.38%	-19.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.49%	36.87%	-34.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.73%	41.48%	-37.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.43%	28.25%	-22.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.15%	27.60%	-22.45%

FLGV vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLGV and FLKR have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLGV vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

FLGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, more than FLKR's 1.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLGV Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF	4.15%	4.07%	4.13%	3.46%	2.21%	1.92%	0.97%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	1.89%	3.87%	7.08%	2.28%	3.13%	2.12%	0.99%	2.09%	1.86%	1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLGV and FLKR in my portfolio?

FLGV and FLKR have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLGV or FLKR?

FLKR has higher volatility (20.38%) compared to FLGV (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLGV dropped -17.63% vs FLKR's -50.06%.

Which ETF is better, FLGV or FLKR?

On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 18.41% vs -0.15% for FLGV. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, FLGV has been the lower-risk option at 1.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLGV or FLKR?

Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 18.41% return vs -0.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLGV or FLKR?

FLGV and FLKR have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLGV or FLKR?

FLGV has the higher dividend yield at 4.15%, compared with 1.89% for FLKR.

What is the main difference between FLGV and FLKR?

FLGV is categorized as Government Bonds, while FLKR is Asia Pacific Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.18 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.