PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLGR vs. FEZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLGR vs. FEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) and State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLGR achieves a 5.02% return, which is significantly lower than FEZ's 12.77% return.


FLGR

1D
1.04%
1M
3.52%
6M
2.61%
YTD
5.02%
1Y
8.32%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
7.78%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.33%

FEZ

1D
1.25%
1M
3.42%
6M
8.25%
YTD
12.77%
1Y
26.56%
3Y*
19.55%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
11.38%
ALL TIME*
7.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$55.97M$50.87M$93.05M
$111.58K$111.40K$160.27K

FLGR vs. FEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLGR
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF
5.02%36.67%10.63%24.22%-21.96%5.40%12.11%19.99%-21.50%-0.16%
FEZ
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
12.77%37.81%3.57%27.16%-14.27%14.84%4.84%26.04%-15.85%-1.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FLGR and FEZ is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.89

The correlation between FLGR and FEZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLGR vs. FEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLGR
FEZ

Industrials

30.4%
22.1%

Financial Services

22.4%
26.2%

Technology

14.8%
16.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
9.5%

Healthcare

6.6%
5.3%

Communication Services

5.4%
1.9%

Basic Materials

5.2%
3.5%

Utilities

4.7%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

1.5%
5.6%

Real Estate

1.2%

-

Energy

-

4.5%

Industrials

FLGR
30.4%
FEZ
22.1%

Financial Services

FLGR
22.4%
FEZ
26.2%

Technology

FLGR
14.8%
FEZ
16.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FLGR
7.7%
FEZ
9.5%

Healthcare

FLGR
6.6%
FEZ
5.3%

Communication Services

FLGR
5.4%
FEZ
1.9%

Basic Materials

FLGR
5.2%
FEZ
3.5%

Utilities

FLGR
4.7%
FEZ
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

FLGR
1.5%
FEZ
5.6%

Real Estate

FLGR
1.2%
FEZ

-

Energy

FLGR

-

FEZ
4.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLGR vs. FEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLGR
FLGR Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FLGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGR Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGR Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

FEZ
FEZ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLGR vs. FEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) and State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLGRFEZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.25

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

1.96

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.69

6.82

-5.13

FLGR vs. FEZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLGR Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the FEZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLGR and FEZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLGR vs. FEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLGR drawdown since its inception was -46.21%, smaller than the maximum FEZ drawdown of -64.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLGR and FEZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLGRFEZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.21%

-64.21%

+18.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.44%

-13.63%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

-15.85%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.69%

-35.05%

-7.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.22%

-16.96%

+4.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.93%

3.90%

+1.03%

Volatility

FLGR vs. FEZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) is 4.65%, while State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) has a volatility of 4.98%. This indicates that FLGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLGRFEZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

4.98%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.16%

15.99%

-0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.54%

18.42%

-0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.37%

20.71%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.36%

20.71%

+0.65%

FLGR vs. FEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLGR has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FEZ's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLGR vs. FEZ - Dividend Comparison

FLGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, more than FEZ's 2.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEZ
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
2.49%2.78%2.94%2.75%3.06%2.61%2.13%2.61%3.45%2.44%3.35%3.03%
FLGR
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF
3.24%1.72%2.40%2.99%3.50%2.67%2.61%2.52%3.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, FLGR and FEZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FEZ has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to FLGR (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLGR dropped -46.21% vs FEZ's -64.21%.

On 5-year performance, FEZ leads with 11.73% vs 7.78% for FLGR. On fees, FLGR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLGR has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FEZ has performed better with a 11.73% return vs 7.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLGR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FEZ.

FLGR has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 2.49% for FEZ.

FLGR tracks FTSE Germany RIC Capped Index, while FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLGR and 0.29% for FEZ.

FEZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLGR and FEZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer