PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLGR vs. FEZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLGR vs. FEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) and SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLGR achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly lower than FEZ's 6.51% return.


FLGR

1D
0.13%
1M
3.06%
YTD
2.39%
6M
6.46%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
18.36%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*

FEZ

1D
0.81%
1M
3.77%
YTD
6.51%
6M
8.91%
1Y
17.63%
3Y*
18.22%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
10.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLGR vs. FEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLGR
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF
2.39%36.67%10.63%24.22%-21.96%5.40%12.11%19.99%-21.50%-0.27%
FEZ
SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
6.51%37.81%3.57%27.16%-14.27%14.84%4.84%26.04%-15.85%-1.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FLGR and FEZ is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.89

The correlation between FLGR and FEZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLGR vs. FEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLGR
FEZ

Industrials

30.5%
20.1%

Financial Services

21.7%
23.4%

Technology

13.9%
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
8.6%

Communication Services

6.3%
3.5%

Basic Materials

5.9%
3.5%

Healthcare

5.8%
5.2%

Utilities

5.0%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
5.4%

Real Estate

1.3%

-

Energy

-

5.0%

Industrials

FLGR
30.5%
FEZ
20.1%

Financial Services

FLGR
21.7%
FEZ
23.4%

Technology

FLGR
13.9%
FEZ
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FLGR
8.2%
FEZ
8.6%

Communication Services

FLGR
6.3%
FEZ
3.5%

Basic Materials

FLGR
5.9%
FEZ
3.5%

Healthcare

FLGR
5.8%
FEZ
5.2%

Utilities

FLGR
5.0%
FEZ
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

FLGR
1.4%
FEZ
5.4%

Real Estate

FLGR
1.3%
FEZ

-

Energy

FLGR

-

FEZ
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLGR vs. FEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLGR
FLGR Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
FLGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGR Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGR Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

FEZ
FEZ Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLGR vs. FEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) and SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLGRFEZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.27

0.99

-0.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.50

1.49

-0.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.18

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

1.40

-1.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.11

4.79

-3.68

FLGR vs. FEZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLGR Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the FEZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLGR and FEZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLGRFEZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

0.99

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.50

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.30

-0.01

Drawdowns

FLGR vs. FEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLGR drawdown since its inception was -46.21%, smaller than the maximum FEZ drawdown of -64.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLGR and FEZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLGRFEZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.21%

-64.21%

+18.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.44%

-13.63%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

-15.85%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.54%

-35.05%

-8.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

-1.09%

-1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.37%

-17.08%

+4.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.02%

3.99%

+1.03%

Volatility

FLGR vs. FEZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) is 6.22%, while SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) has a volatility of 7.17%. This indicates that FLGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLGRFEZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.22%

7.17%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.92%

14.80%

-0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.09%

17.90%

-0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.24%

20.60%

-0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.42%

21.11%

+0.31%

FLGR vs. FEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLGR has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FEZ's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLGR vs. FEZ - Dividend Comparison

FLGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than FEZ's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEZ
SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
2.54%2.78%2.94%2.75%3.06%2.61%2.13%2.61%3.45%2.44%3.35%3.03%
FLGR
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF
1.68%1.72%2.40%2.99%3.50%2.67%2.61%2.52%3.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, FLGR and FEZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FEZ has higher volatility (7.17%) compared to FLGR (6.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLGR dropped -46.21% vs FEZ's -64.21%.

On 5-year performance, FEZ leads with 10.33% vs 7.01% for FLGR. On fees, FLGR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLGR has been the lower-risk option at 6.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FEZ has performed better with a 10.33% return vs 7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLGR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FEZ.

FEZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 1.68% for FLGR.

FLGR tracks FTSE Germany RIC Capped Index, while FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLGR and 0.29% for FEZ.

FEZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLGR and FEZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer