FLGR vs. FEZ
FLGR (Franklin FTSE Germany ETF) and FEZ (SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - FLGR tracks the FTSE Germany RIC Capped Index while FEZ tracks the EURO STOXX 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLGR returned 7.01%/yr vs 10.33%/yr for FEZ. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLGR charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FEZ.
Performance
FLGR vs. FEZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLGR achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly lower than FEZ's 6.51% return.
FLGR
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 6M
- 6.46%
- 1Y
- 4.65%
- 3Y*
- 18.36%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- —
FEZ
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 6.51%
- 6M
- 8.91%
- 1Y
- 17.63%
- 3Y*
- 18.22%
- 5Y*
- 10.33%
- 10Y*
- 10.42%
FLGR vs. FEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLGR Franklin FTSE Germany ETF | 2.39% | 36.67% | 10.63% | 24.22% | -21.96% | 5.40% | 12.11% | 19.99% | -21.50% | -0.27% |
FEZ SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 6.51% | 37.81% | 3.57% | 27.16% | -14.27% | 14.84% | 4.84% | 26.04% | -15.85% | -1.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLGR and FEZ is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.89 |
The correlation between FLGR and FEZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLGR vs. FEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLGR
FEZ
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Industrials
FLGR
FEZ
Financial Services
FLGR
FEZ
Technology
FLGR
FEZ
Consumer Cyclical
FLGR
FEZ
Communication Services
FLGR
FEZ
Basic Materials
FLGR
FEZ
Healthcare
FLGR
FEZ
Utilities
FLGR
FEZ
Consumer Defensive
FLGR
FEZ
Real Estate
FLGR
FEZ
-
Energy
FLGR
-
FEZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLGR vs. FEZ — Risk / Return Rank
FLGR
FEZ
FLGR vs. FEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) and SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLGR | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.27 | 0.99 | -0.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.50 | 1.49 | -0.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.18 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 1.40 | -1.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.11 | 4.79 | -3.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLGR | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 0.99 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.50 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.30 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
FLGR vs. FEZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLGR drawdown since its inception was -46.21%, smaller than the maximum FEZ drawdown of -64.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLGR and FEZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLGR | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.21% | -64.21% | +18.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.44% | -13.63% | -0.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.53% | -15.85% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.54% | -35.05% | -8.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.40% | -1.09% | -1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.37% | -17.08% | +4.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.02% | 3.99% | +1.03% |
Volatility
FLGR vs. FEZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) is 6.22%, while SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) has a volatility of 7.17%. This indicates that FLGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLGR | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | 7.17% | -0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.92% | 14.80% | -0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.09% | 17.90% | -0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.24% | 20.60% | -0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.42% | 21.11% | +0.31% |
FLGR vs. FEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLGR has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FEZ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLGR vs. FEZ - Dividend Comparison
FLGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than FEZ's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEZ SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 2.54% | 2.78% | 2.94% | 2.75% | 3.06% | 2.61% | 2.13% | 2.61% | 3.45% | 2.44% | 3.35% | 3.03% |
FLGR Franklin FTSE Germany ETF | 1.68% | 1.72% | 2.40% | 2.99% | 3.50% | 2.67% | 2.61% | 2.52% | 3.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, FLGR and FEZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FEZ has higher volatility (7.17%) compared to FLGR (6.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLGR dropped -46.21% vs FEZ's -64.21%.
On 5-year performance, FEZ leads with 10.33% vs 7.01% for FLGR. On fees, FLGR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLGR has been the lower-risk option at 6.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FEZ has performed better with a 10.33% return vs 7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLGR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FEZ.
FEZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 1.68% for FLGR.
FLGR tracks FTSE Germany RIC Capped Index, while FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLGR and 0.29% for FEZ.
FEZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLGR and FEZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer