FLEU vs. FLKR
FLEU (Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLEU is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed Eurozone Index - Benchmark TR Net, while FLKR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLEU returned 12.08%/yr vs 19.96%/yr for FLKR. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.
Performance
FLEU vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLEU achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 116.13% return.
FLEU
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 7.22%
- 6M
- 10.70%
- 1Y
- 19.04%
- 3Y*
- 16.81%
- 5Y*
- 12.08%
- 10Y*
- —
FLKR
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 31.27%
- YTD
- 116.13%
- 6M
- 134.17%
- 1Y
- 242.73%
- 3Y*
- 51.55%
- 5Y*
- 19.96%
- 10Y*
- —
FLEU vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLEU Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF | 7.22% | 41.56% | 2.26% | 16.21% | -9.14% | 23.27% | 0.95% | 26.94% | -8.54% | -1.24% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 116.13% | 91.91% | -18.84% | 19.16% | -27.50% | -7.54% | 42.64% | 8.88% | -21.30% | 2.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLEU and FLKR is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.51 |
The correlation between FLEU and FLKR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLEU vs. FLKR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLEU
FLKR
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
FLEU
FLKR
Industrials
FLEU
FLKR
Technology
FLEU
FLKR
Consumer Cyclical
FLEU
FLKR
Utilities
FLEU
FLKR
Healthcare
FLEU
FLKR
Consumer Defensive
FLEU
FLKR
Basic Materials
FLEU
FLKR
Energy
FLEU
FLKR
Communication Services
FLEU
FLKR
Real Estate
FLEU
FLKR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLEU vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank
FLEU
FLKR
FLEU vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLEU | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.13 | 5.94 | -4.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.67 | 5.28 | -3.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.74 | -0.53 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 10.80 | -9.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.48 | 40.15 | -34.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLEU | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 5.94 | -4.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.71 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.56 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
FLEU vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLEU drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLEU and FLKR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLEU | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.94% | -50.06% | +16.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.41% | -23.03% | +9.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.67% | -26.39% | +10.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.67% | -49.51% | +30.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -0.99% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.71% | -22.08% | +17.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 6.19% | -2.51% |
Volatility
FLEU vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU) is 7.12%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 20.11%. This indicates that FLEU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLEU | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.12% | 20.11% | -12.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.35% | 36.51% | -22.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.01% | 41.18% | -24.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 28.18% | -11.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 27.57% | -9.31% |
FLEU vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FLEU and FLKR have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLEU vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison
FLEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than FLKR's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLEU Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF | 2.07% | 2.22% | 3.18% | 3.25% | 21.45% | 3.03% | 1.94% | 6.06% | 12.17% | 0.07% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 1.79% | 3.87% | 7.08% | 2.28% | 3.13% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 2.09% | 1.86% | 1.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLEU and FLKR have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLKR has higher volatility (20.11%) compared to FLEU (7.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLEU dropped -33.94% vs FLKR's -50.06%.
On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 19.96% vs 12.08% for FLEU. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, FLEU has been the lower-risk option at 7.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 19.96% return vs 12.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLEU and FLKR have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.
FLEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 1.79% for FLKR.
FLEU is categorized as Europe Equities, while FLKR is Asia Pacific Equities. FLEU tracks FTSE Developed Eurozone Index - Benchmark TR Net, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index.
FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.94 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLEU and FLKR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer