PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLEU vs. FLKR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLEU vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLEU achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 116.13% return.


FLEU

1D
0.52%
1M
3.45%
YTD
7.22%
6M
10.70%
1Y
19.04%
3Y*
16.81%
5Y*
12.08%
10Y*

FLKR

1D
-0.99%
1M
31.27%
YTD
116.13%
6M
134.17%
1Y
242.73%
3Y*
51.55%
5Y*
19.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLEU vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLEU
Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF
7.22%41.56%2.26%16.21%-9.14%23.27%0.95%26.94%-8.54%-1.24%
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
116.13%91.91%-18.84%19.16%-27.50%-7.54%42.64%8.88%-21.30%2.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FLEU and FLKR is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.51

The correlation between FLEU and FLKR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLEU vs. FLKR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLEU
FLKR

Financial Services

24.8%
7.6%

Industrials

21.0%
12.8%

Technology

14.7%
64.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
6.0%

Utilities

7.1%
0.3%

Healthcare

5.8%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
1.5%

Basic Materials

4.3%
2.6%

Energy

4.0%
0.4%

Communication Services

3.6%
1.6%

Real Estate

1.2%

-

Financial Services

FLEU
24.8%
FLKR
7.6%

Industrials

FLEU
21.0%
FLKR
12.8%

Technology

FLEU
14.7%
FLKR
64.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FLEU
8.4%
FLKR
6.0%

Utilities

FLEU
7.1%
FLKR
0.3%

Healthcare

FLEU
5.8%
FLKR
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

FLEU
5.2%
FLKR
1.5%

Basic Materials

FLEU
4.3%
FLKR
2.6%

Energy

FLEU
4.0%
FLKR
0.4%

Communication Services

FLEU
3.6%
FLKR
1.6%

Real Estate

FLEU
1.2%
FLKR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLEU vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLEU
FLEU Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FLEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLEU Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FLEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLEU Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

FLKR
FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLEU vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLEUFLKRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.13

5.94

-4.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.67

5.28

-3.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.74

-0.53

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

10.80

-9.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.48

40.15

-34.67

FLEU vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 5.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLEU and FLKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLEUFLKRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

5.94

-4.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.71

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.56

+0.02

Drawdowns

FLEU vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLEU drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLEU and FLKR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLEUFLKRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.94%

-50.06%

+16.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.41%

-23.03%

+9.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.67%

-26.39%

+10.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.67%

-49.51%

+30.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-0.99%

+0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-22.08%

+17.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.68%

6.19%

-2.51%

Volatility

FLEU vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF (FLEU) is 7.12%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 20.11%. This indicates that FLEU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLEUFLKRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.12%

20.11%

-12.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.35%

36.51%

-22.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.01%

41.18%

-24.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.33%

28.18%

-11.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.26%

27.57%

-9.31%

FLEU vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLEU and FLKR have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLEU vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

FLEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than FLKR's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLEU
Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF
2.07%2.22%3.18%3.25%21.45%3.03%1.94%6.06%12.17%0.07%
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
1.79%3.87%7.08%2.28%3.13%2.12%0.99%2.09%1.86%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLEU and FLKR have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLKR has higher volatility (20.11%) compared to FLEU (7.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLEU dropped -33.94% vs FLKR's -50.06%.

On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 19.96% vs 12.08% for FLEU. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, FLEU has been the lower-risk option at 7.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 19.96% return vs 12.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLEU and FLKR have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

FLEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 1.79% for FLKR.

FLEU is categorized as Europe Equities, while FLKR is Asia Pacific Equities. FLEU tracks FTSE Developed Eurozone Index - Benchmark TR Net, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index.

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.94 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLEU and FLKR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer