FLEH vs. FLKR
FLEH (Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLEH is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed Europe RIC Capped Index, while FLKR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLEH returned 11.81%/yr vs 19.48%/yr for FLKR. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.
Performance
FLEH vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLEH achieves a 6.27% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 114.41% return.
FLEH
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 4.88%
- YTD
- 6.27%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 18.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.47%
- 5Y*
- 11.81%
- 10Y*
- —
FLKR
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 29.00%
- YTD
- 114.41%
- 6M
- 130.14%
- 1Y
- 238.40%
- 3Y*
- 51.14%
- 5Y*
- 19.48%
- 10Y*
- —
FLEH vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLEH Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF | 6.27% | 41.56% | 2.26% | 16.21% | -9.14% | 23.27% | 0.95% | 26.94% | -8.54% | -1.24% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 114.41% | 91.91% | -18.84% | 19.16% | -27.50% | -7.54% | 42.64% | 8.88% | -21.30% | 2.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLEH and FLKR is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.51 |
The correlation between FLEH and FLKR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLEH vs. FLKR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLEH
FLKR
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
FLEH
FLKR
Industrials
FLEH
FLKR
Healthcare
FLEH
FLKR
Consumer Defensive
FLEH
FLKR
Consumer Cyclical
FLEH
FLKR
Technology
FLEH
FLKR
Basic Materials
FLEH
FLKR
Energy
FLEH
FLKR
Utilities
FLEH
FLKR
Communication Services
FLEH
FLKR
Real Estate
FLEH
FLKR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLEH vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank
FLEH
FLKR
FLEH vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF (FLEH) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLEH | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.73 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 10.42 | -9.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | 38.67 | -33.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLEH | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 5.83 | -4.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.69 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.55 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
FLEH vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLEH drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLEH and FLKR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLEH | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.94% | -50.06% | +16.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.41% | -23.03% | +9.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.67% | -26.39% | +10.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.67% | -49.51% | +30.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -1.77% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.71% | -22.07% | +17.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 6.20% | -2.52% |
Volatility
FLEH vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF (FLEH) is 6.75%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 20.21%. This indicates that FLEH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLEH | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.75% | 20.21% | -13.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.38% | 36.52% | -22.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.02% | 41.18% | -24.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 28.19% | -11.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.25% | 27.56% | -9.31% |
FLEH vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FLEH and FLKR have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLEH vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison
FLEH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, more than FLKR's 1.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLEH Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF | 2.09% | 2.22% | 3.18% | 3.25% | 21.45% | 3.03% | 1.94% | 6.06% | 12.17% | 0.07% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 1.80% | 3.87% | 7.08% | 2.28% | 3.13% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 2.09% | 1.86% | 1.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLEH and FLKR have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLKR has higher volatility (20.21%) compared to FLEH (6.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLEH dropped -33.94% vs FLKR's -50.06%.
On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 19.48% vs 11.81% for FLEH. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, FLEH has been the lower-risk option at 6.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 19.48% return vs 11.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLEH and FLKR have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.
FLEH has the higher dividend yield at 2.09%, compared with 1.80% for FLKR.
FLEH is categorized as Europe Equities, while FLKR is Asia Pacific Equities. FLEH tracks FTSE Developed Europe RIC Capped Index, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index.
FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.83 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLEH and FLKR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer