FLDGX vs. TPDAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund (FLDGX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX).
FLDGX is managed by Meeder Funds. It was launched on Feb 28, 2000. TPDAX is managed by Timothy Plan. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009.
Performance
FLDGX vs. TPDAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLDGX vs. TPDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLDGX Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund | -4.16% | 17.24% | 30.96% | 20.70% | -15.46% | 19.51% | 15.41% | 24.00% | -8.65% | 21.22% |
TPDAX Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund | 7.48% | 23.97% | 5.29% | 7.71% | -5.63% | 12.15% | 8.83% | 13.77% | -7.24% | 4.14% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLDGX achieves a -4.16% return, which is significantly lower than TPDAX's 7.48% return. Over the past 10 years, FLDGX has outperformed TPDAX with an annualized return of 11.67%, while TPDAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.10% annualized return.
FLDGX
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -8.40%
- YTD
- -4.16%
- 6M
- -1.51%
- 1Y
- 15.20%
- 3Y*
- 18.78%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- 11.67%
TPDAX
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -6.08%
- YTD
- 7.48%
- 6M
- 12.53%
- 1Y
- 24.49%
- 3Y*
- 13.72%
- 5Y*
- 9.55%
- 10Y*
- 7.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLDGX vs. TPDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLDGX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is lower than TPDAX's 1.37% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLDGX vs. TPDAX — Risk / Return Rank
FLDGX
TPDAX
FLDGX vs. TPDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund (FLDGX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLDGX | TPDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 2.07 | -1.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.43 | 2.68 | -1.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.39 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 3.33 | -2.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.57 | 12.75 | -7.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLDGX | TPDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 2.07 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.95 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.72 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.58 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLDGX and TPDAX is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FLDGX vs. TPDAX - Dividend Comparison
FLDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.87%, more than TPDAX's 0.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLDGX Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund | 7.87% | 7.53% | 29.01% | 0.99% | 3.71% | 14.92% | 2.21% | 2.21% | 1.30% | 8.48% | 1.44% | 3.39% |
TPDAX Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund | 0.75% | 0.80% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 4.48% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 2.89% | 2.69% | 0.13% | 0.33% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FLDGX vs. TPDAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLDGX drawdown since its inception was -58.72%, which is greater than TPDAX's maximum drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDGX and TPDAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLDGX | TPDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.72% | -22.29% | -36.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.31% | -7.58% | -3.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.96% | -17.58% | -16.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.96% | -22.29% | -11.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.17% | -6.56% | -2.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.94% | -4.94% | -12.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.40% | 1.98% | +0.42% |
Volatility
FLDGX vs. TPDAX - Volatility Comparison
Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund (FLDGX) has a higher volatility of 4.78% compared to Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX) at 4.00%. This indicates that FLDGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLDGX | TPDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.78% | 4.00% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.07% | 9.73% | -0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.63% | 12.21% | +4.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 10.12% | +8.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 9.86% | +8.60% |