FLDGX vs. SPY
Compare and contrast key facts about Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund (FLDGX) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY).
FLDGX is managed by Meeder Funds. It was launched on Feb 28, 2000. SPY is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Jan 22, 1993.
Performance
FLDGX vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLDGX vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLDGX Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund | -4.16% | 17.24% | 30.96% | 20.70% | -15.46% | 19.51% | 15.41% | 24.00% | -8.65% | 21.22% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | -4.37% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLDGX achieves a -4.16% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's -4.37% return. Over the past 10 years, FLDGX has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 11.67%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 13.98% annualized return.
FLDGX
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -8.40%
- YTD
- -4.16%
- 6M
- -1.51%
- 1Y
- 15.20%
- 3Y*
- 18.78%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- 11.67%
SPY
- 1D
- 2.91%
- 1M
- -4.94%
- YTD
- -4.37%
- 6M
- -1.82%
- 1Y
- 17.59%
- 3Y*
- 18.19%
- 5Y*
- 11.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLDGX vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLDGX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLDGX vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
FLDGX
SPY
FLDGX vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund (FLDGX) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLDGX | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 0.93 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.43 | 1.45 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.22 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 1.53 | -0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.57 | 7.30 | -1.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLDGX | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 0.93 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.69 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.78 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.56 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLDGX and SPY is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FLDGX vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
FLDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.87%, more than SPY's 1.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLDGX Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund | 7.87% | 7.53% | 29.01% | 0.99% | 3.71% | 14.92% | 2.21% | 2.21% | 1.30% | 8.48% | 1.44% | 3.39% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.14% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Drawdowns
FLDGX vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLDGX drawdown since its inception was -58.72%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDGX and SPY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLDGX | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.72% | -55.19% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.31% | -12.05% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.96% | -24.50% | -9.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.96% | -33.72% | -0.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.17% | -6.24% | -2.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.94% | -9.09% | -7.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.40% | 2.52% | -0.12% |
Volatility
FLDGX vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund (FLDGX) is 4.78%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that FLDGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLDGX | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.78% | 5.31% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.07% | 9.47% | -0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.63% | 19.05% | -2.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 17.06% | +1.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 17.92% | +0.54% |