FLDGX vs. SPY
Compare and contrast key facts about Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund (FLDGX) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY).
FLDGX is managed by Meeder Funds. It was launched on Feb 28, 2000. SPY is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Jan 22, 1993.
Performance
FLDGX vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLDGX vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLDGX Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund | -1.36% | 17.24% | 30.96% | 20.70% | -15.46% | 19.51% | 15.41% | 24.00% | -8.65% | 21.22% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | -3.65% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLDGX achieves a -1.36% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's -3.65% return. Over the past 10 years, FLDGX has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 11.99%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 14.06% annualized return.
FLDGX
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- -5.42%
- YTD
- -1.36%
- 6M
- 1.04%
- 1Y
- 18.02%
- 3Y*
- 19.93%
- 5Y*
- 11.61%
- 10Y*
- 11.99%
SPY
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -4.28%
- YTD
- -3.65%
- 6M
- -1.42%
- 1Y
- 18.14%
- 3Y*
- 18.48%
- 5Y*
- 11.86%
- 10Y*
- 14.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLDGX vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLDGX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLDGX vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
FLDGX
SPY
FLDGX vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund (FLDGX) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLDGX | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.11 | 0.96 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.67 | 1.49 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.23 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 1.53 | +0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.73 | 7.27 | +0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLDGX | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 0.96 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.70 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.79 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.56 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLDGX and SPY is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FLDGX vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
FLDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.65%, more than SPY's 1.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLDGX Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund | 7.65% | 7.53% | 29.01% | 0.99% | 3.71% | 14.92% | 2.21% | 2.21% | 1.30% | 8.48% | 1.44% | 3.39% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.13% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Drawdowns
FLDGX vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLDGX drawdown since its inception was -58.72%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDGX and SPY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLDGX | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.72% | -55.19% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.31% | -12.05% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.96% | -24.50% | -9.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.96% | -33.72% | -0.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.52% | -5.53% | -0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.94% | -9.09% | -7.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 2.54% | -0.10% |
Volatility
FLDGX vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund (FLDGX) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 5.35%. This indicates that FLDGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLDGX | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.81% | 5.35% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.52% | 9.50% | +0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.84% | 19.06% | -2.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.91% | 17.06% | +1.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 17.92% | +0.56% |