FLDB vs. SDCI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLDB (Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF) and SDCI (USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FLDB is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity, while SDCI is a Commodities fund actively managed by Wainwright, Inc.. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FLDB returned 4.19% vs 40.79% for SDCI. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. FLDB charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for SDCI.

Performance

FLDB vs. SDCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB) and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLDB achieves a 1.28% return, which is significantly lower than SDCI's 28.92% return.

FLDB

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.19%
• YTD: 1.28%
• 6M: 1.64%
• 1Y: 4.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SDCI

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -1.11%
• YTD: 28.92%
• 6M: 26.57%
• 1Y: 40.79%
• 3Y*: 23.74%
• 5Y*: 20.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLDB vs. SDCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FLDB Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF	1.28%	4.93%	4.29%
SDCI USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund	28.92%	17.60%	14.56%

Correlation

The correlation between FLDB and SDCI is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2024	-0.10

The correlation between FLDB and SDCI shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to -0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FLDB vs. SDCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLDB

FLDB Risk / Return Rank: 98
FLDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FLDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
FLDB Omega Ratio Rank: 98
FLDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FLDB Martin Ratio Rank: 99

SDCI

SDCI Risk / Return Rank: 74
SDCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
SDCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
SDCI Omega Ratio Rank: 66
SDCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
SDCI Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLDB vs. SDCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB) and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLDB	SDCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.67	2.44	+2.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	8.43	3.10	+5.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.11	1.41	+0.71
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	25.08	4.53	+20.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	93.63	16.31	+77.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLDB vs. SDCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLDB Sharpe Ratio is 4.67, which is higher than the SDCI Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLDB and SDCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLDB	SDCI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.67	2.44	+2.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.56	0.68	+2.88

Drawdowns

FLDB vs. SDCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLDB drawdown since its inception was -0.49%, smaller than the maximum SDCI drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDB and SDCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLDB	SDCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.49%	-45.79%	+45.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.17%	-9.04%	+8.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.96%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-3.04%	+2.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.05%	-11.58%	+11.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.04%	2.51%	-2.47%

Volatility

FLDB vs. SDCI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB) is 0.34%, while USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) has a volatility of 4.61%. This indicates that FLDB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SDCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLDB	SDCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.34%	4.61%	-4.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.61%	14.15%	-13.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91%	16.83%	-15.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.31%	18.46%	-17.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.31%	17.08%	-15.77%

FLDB vs. SDCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLDB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SDCI's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLDB vs. SDCI - Dividend Comparison

FLDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, more than SDCI's 2.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FLDB Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF	4.45%	4.72%	3.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SDCI USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund	2.85%	3.68%	5.92%	3.46%	33.49%	19.26%	0.20%	0.93%	0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLDB and SDCI in my portfolio?

FLDB and SDCI have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLDB or SDCI?

SDCI has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to FLDB (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLDB dropped -0.49% vs SDCI's -45.79%.

Which ETF is better, FLDB or SDCI?

On 1-year performance, SDCI leads with 40.79% vs 4.19% for FLDB. On fees, FLDB is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, FLDB has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLDB or SDCI?

Over the 1-year period, SDCI has performed better with a 40.79% return vs 4.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLDB or SDCI?

FLDB is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for SDCI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLDB or SDCI?

FLDB has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 2.85% for SDCI.

What is the main difference between FLDB and SDCI?

FLDB is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while SDCI is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Wainwright, Inc.. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for FLDB and 0.70% for SDCI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.67 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.