FLCV vs. GCOW
FLCV (Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF) and GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. FLCV is actively managed, while GCOW is passively managed. Over the past year, FLCV returned 25.65% vs 41.14% for GCOW. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLCV charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GCOW.
Performance
FLCV vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCV achieves a 5.32% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 13.63% return.
FLCV
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 5.32%
- 6M
- 9.26%
- 1Y
- 25.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GCOW
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 13.63%
- 6M
- 20.91%
- 1Y
- 41.14%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 13.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.30%
FLCV vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FLCV Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF | 5.32% | 15.64% | 6.56% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 13.63% | 27.34% | -2.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCV and GCOW is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024 | 0.56 |
The correlation between FLCV and GCOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.57 — a consistent structural relationship.
FLCV vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLCV has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLCV vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank
FLCV
GCOW
FLCV vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF (FLCV) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLCV | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.03 | 3.68 | -1.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.87 | 5.22 | -2.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.66 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.79 | 9.55 | -3.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.25 | 28.88 | -7.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLCV | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 3.68 | -1.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.60 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
FLCV vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCV drawdown since its inception was -15.93%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCV and GCOW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCV | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.93% | -37.64% | +21.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.70% | -4.77% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.48% | +1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.19% | -5.89% | +3.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 1.58% | -0.03% |
Volatility
FLCV vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF (FLCV) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 3.16%. This indicates that FLCV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLCV | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.27% | 3.16% | +1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.07% | 7.79% | +1.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.81% | 12.16% | +2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.32% | 13.48% | +1.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.32% | 16.22% | -0.90% |
Dividends
FLCV vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison
FLCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than GCOW's 4.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCV Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF | 0.78% | 0.83% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.38% | 4.06% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% |