FLCH vs. XDG7.DE

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) and XDG7.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - FLCH is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index, while XDG7.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy Select. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FLCH returned 8.94%/yr vs 7.48%/yr for XDG7.DE. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLCH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XDG7.DE.

Performance

FLCH vs. XDG7.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FLCH is traded in USD, while XDG7.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XDG7.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCH achieves a -9.50% return, which is significantly lower than XDG7.DE's 32.71% return.

FLCH

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: -8.03%
• YTD: -9.50%
• 6M: -11.21%
• 1Y: 2.19%
• 3Y*: 8.94%
• 5Y*: -5.25%
• 10Y*: —

XDG7.DE

• 1D: -2.23%
• 1M: 2.51%
• YTD: 32.71%
• 6M: 32.74%
• 1Y: 74.51%
• 3Y*: 7.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCH vs. XDG7.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	-9.50%	32.55%	18.00%	-18.14%
XDG7.DE Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C	32.71%	39.50%	-20.04%	-23.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCH and XDG7.DE is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2023	0.44

Return for Risk

FLCH vs. XDG7.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCH

FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 11
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 11
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 11

XDG7.DE

XDG7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 76
XDG7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
XDG7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
XDG7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 89
XDG7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
XDG7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCH vs. XDG7.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLCH	XDG7.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.11	2.44	-2.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.30	3.25	-2.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.54	-0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.13	4.16	-4.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.29	11.25	-10.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLCH vs. XDG7.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCH Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the XDG7.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCH and XDG7.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLCH	XDG7.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11	2.44	-2.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.18	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	0.16	-0.15

Drawdowns

FLCH vs. XDG7.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCH drawdown since its inception was -62.09%, which is greater than XDG7.DE's maximum drawdown of -47.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCH and XDG7.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCH	XDG7.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.09%	-47.37%	-14.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.14%	-18.01%	+0.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.43%	-43.79%	+18.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.20%	-3.11%	-33.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.54%	-24.05%	-6.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.58%	6.67%	+0.91%

Volatility

FLCH vs. XDG7.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) is 6.46%, while Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE) has a volatility of 8.33%. This indicates that FLCH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDG7.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLCH	XDG7.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.46%	8.33%	-1.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.88%	14.53%	-0.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.31%	30.76%	-11.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.61%	25.62%	+3.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.91%	25.62%	+2.29%

FLCH vs. XDG7.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XDG7.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLCH vs. XDG7.DE - Dividend Comparison

FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, while XDG7.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	2.61%	2.36%	2.87%	3.47%	2.69%	1.48%	0.91%	1.98%	1.92%	0.01%
XDG7.DE Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLCH and XDG7.DE in my portfolio?

FLCH and XDG7.DE have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FLCH or XDG7.DE?

On fees, FLCH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLCH or XDG7.DE?

FLCH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XDG7.DE.

What is the main difference between FLCH and XDG7.DE?

FLCH is categorized as China Equities, while XDG7.DE is Energy Equities. FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index, while XDG7.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy Select. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLCH and 0.35% for XDG7.DE.