PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCH vs. LVHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCH vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCH achieves a -6.60% return, which is significantly lower than LVHI's 12.09% return.


FLCH

1D
-0.31%
1M
-2.97%
YTD
-6.60%
6M
-7.51%
1Y
5.91%
3Y*
10.54%
5Y*
-4.99%
10Y*

LVHI

1D
0.34%
1M
0.75%
YTD
12.09%
6M
13.88%
1Y
30.86%
3Y*
21.26%
5Y*
15.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCH vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
-6.60%32.55%18.00%-11.21%-22.74%-20.87%30.09%24.32%-19.52%0.91%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
12.09%27.12%14.81%17.45%3.84%18.19%-8.76%18.35%-5.22%-0.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCH and LVHI is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.39

The correlation between FLCH and LVHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLCH vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLCH
LVHI

Consumer Cyclical

23.4%
5.3%

Financial Services

18.2%
23.6%

Communication Services

14.2%
5.8%

Technology

12.9%
0.1%

Industrials

9.1%
13.4%

Basic Materials

5.5%
6.1%

Healthcare

5.3%
7.4%

Energy

3.7%
17.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
8.7%

Utilities

2.0%
10.4%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FLCH
23.4%
LVHI
5.3%

Financial Services

FLCH
18.2%
LVHI
23.6%

Communication Services

FLCH
14.2%
LVHI
5.8%

Technology

FLCH
12.9%
LVHI
0.1%

Industrials

FLCH
9.1%
LVHI
13.4%

Basic Materials

FLCH
5.5%
LVHI
6.1%

Healthcare

FLCH
5.3%
LVHI
7.4%

Energy

FLCH
3.7%
LVHI
17.4%

Consumer Defensive

FLCH
3.3%
LVHI
8.7%

Utilities

FLCH
2.0%
LVHI
10.4%

Real Estate

FLCH
1.7%
LVHI
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCH vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCH
FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHI
LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCH vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLCHLVHIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.62

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

5.10

-4.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.80

21.22

-20.43

FLCH vs. LVHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCH Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the LVHI Sharpe Ratio of 3.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCH and LVHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLCHLVHIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

3.28

-2.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

1.44

-1.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.82

-0.80

Drawdowns

FLCH vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCH drawdown since its inception was -62.09%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCH and LVHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCHLVHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.09%

-32.31%

-29.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.52%

-6.08%

-9.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.43%

-11.99%

-13.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.78%

-11.99%

-43.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.16%

-1.23%

-32.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.53%

-3.52%

-27.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.43%

1.46%

+5.97%

Volatility

FLCH vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) has a higher volatility of 6.59% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.89%. This indicates that FLCH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCHLVHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.59%

2.89%

+3.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.67%

7.50%

+6.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.20%

9.45%

+9.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.59%

11.06%

+18.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.91%

13.76%

+14.15%

FLCH vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLCH vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison

FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than LVHI's 6.10% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
2.53%2.36%2.87%3.47%2.69%1.48%0.91%1.98%1.92%0.01%0.00%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
6.10%4.92%3.98%8.12%7.74%4.13%3.97%6.67%10.67%3.38%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLCH and LVHI have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLCH has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to LVHI (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCH dropped -62.09% vs LVHI's -32.31%.

On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.88% vs -4.99% for FLCH. On fees, FLCH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.88% return vs -4.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLCH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 6.10%, compared with 2.53% for FLCH.

FLCH is categorized as China Equities, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index, while LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLCH and 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCH and LVHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer