PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCH vs. JCHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCH vs. JCHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCH achieves a -14.03% return, which is significantly lower than JCHI's -5.00% return.


FLCH

1D
-1.54%
1M
-8.25%
YTD
-14.03%
6M
-14.94%
1Y
-4.98%
3Y*
8.15%
5Y*
-6.62%
10Y*

JCHI

1D
-0.24%
1M
-5.91%
YTD
-5.00%
6M
-5.85%
1Y
7.72%
3Y*
7.47%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCH vs. JCHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
-14.03%32.55%18.00%-10.05%
JCHI
JPMorgan Active China ETF
-5.00%27.66%13.77%-17.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCH and JCHI is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2023

0.96

The correlation between FLCH and JCHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCH vs. JCHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCH
FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

JCHI
JCHI Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
JCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
JCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCH vs. JCHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLCHJCHIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.09

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.23

0.54

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.59

1.21

-1.79

FLCH vs. JCHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCH Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the JCHI Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCH and JCHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLCH vs. JCHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCH drawdown since its inception was -62.09%, which is greater than JCHI's maximum drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCH and JCHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCHJCHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.09%

-29.57%

-32.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.29%

-14.37%

-6.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.43%

-27.47%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.40%

-12.47%

-26.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.56%

-13.27%

-17.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.52%

6.41%

+2.11%

Volatility

FLCH vs. JCHI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) is 5.62%, while JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that FLCH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JCHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCHJCHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

6.09%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.09%

13.12%

+0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.27%

17.99%

+1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.63%

24.79%

+4.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.86%

24.79%

+3.07%

FLCH vs. JCHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than JCHI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLCH vs. JCHI - Dividend Comparison

FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than JCHI's 1.91% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
1.81%2.36%2.87%3.47%2.69%1.48%0.91%1.98%1.92%0.01%
JCHI
JPMorgan Active China ETF
1.91%1.81%2.12%2.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FLCH and JCHI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JCHI has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to FLCH (5.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCH dropped -62.09% vs JCHI's -29.57%.

On 3-year performance, FLCH leads with 8.15% vs 7.47% for JCHI. On fees, FLCH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLCH has been the lower-risk option at 5.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FLCH has performed better with a 8.15% return vs 7.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLCH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for JCHI.

JCHI has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 1.81% for FLCH.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLCH and 0.65% for JCHI.

JCHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCH and JCHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer