FLCH vs. FXI
FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) and FXI (iShares China Large-Cap ETF) are both China Equities funds - FLCH tracks the FTSE China RIC Capped Index while FXI tracks the FTSE China 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLCH returned -4.93%/yr vs -3.18%/yr for FXI. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FLCH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FXI.
Performance
FLCH vs. FXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCH achieves a -6.30% return, which is significantly higher than FXI's -7.18% return.
FLCH
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -2.79%
- YTD
- -6.30%
- 6M
- -7.45%
- 1Y
- 8.36%
- 3Y*
- 10.66%
- 5Y*
- -4.93%
- 10Y*
- —
FXI
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- YTD
- -7.18%
- 6M
- -8.38%
- 1Y
- 2.05%
- 3Y*
- 11.73%
- 5Y*
- -3.18%
- 10Y*
- 2.96%
FLCH vs. FXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | -6.30% | 32.55% | 18.00% | -11.21% | -22.74% | -20.87% | 30.09% | 24.32% | -19.52% | 0.91% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | -7.18% | 28.95% | 28.98% | -12.42% | -20.66% | -20.06% | 8.92% | 14.90% | -13.28% | 1.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCH and FXI is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.96 |
The correlation between FLCH and FXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLCH vs. FXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLCH
FXI
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
FLCH
FXI
Financial Services
FLCH
FXI
Communication Services
FLCH
FXI
Technology
FLCH
FXI
Industrials
FLCH
FXI
Basic Materials
FLCH
FXI
Healthcare
FLCH
FXI
Energy
FLCH
FXI
Consumer Defensive
FLCH
FXI
Utilities
FLCH
FXI
Real Estate
FLCH
FXI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLCH vs. FXI — Risk / Return Rank
FLCH
FXI
FLCH vs. FXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLCH | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.03 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 0.13 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.14 | 0.28 | +0.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLCH | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 0.10 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | -0.10 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.17 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
FLCH vs. FXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCH drawdown since its inception was -62.09%, smaller than the maximum FXI drawdown of -72.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCH and FXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCH | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.09% | -72.68% | +10.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.52% | -15.62% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.43% | -28.72% | +3.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.78% | -54.94% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.95% | -26.91% | -7.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.53% | -31.22% | +0.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.38% | 7.22% | +0.16% |
Volatility
FLCH vs. FXI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) is 6.59%, while iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) has a volatility of 7.13%. This indicates that FLCH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLCH | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.59% | 7.13% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.67% | 14.35% | -0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.22% | 19.93% | -0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.59% | 31.68% | -2.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.91% | 27.67% | +0.24% |
FLCH vs. FXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLCH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FXI's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLCH vs. FXI - Dividend Comparison
FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than FXI's 2.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.52% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 2.69% | 1.48% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 2.60% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, FLCH and FXI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FXI has higher volatility (7.13%) compared to FLCH (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCH dropped -62.09% vs FXI's -72.68%.
On 5-year performance, FXI leads with -3.18% vs -4.93% for FLCH. On fees, FLCH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLCH has been the lower-risk option at 6.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FXI has performed better with a -3.18% return vs -4.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLCH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXI.
FXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 2.52% for FLCH.
FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index, while FXI tracks FTSE China 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLCH and 0.74% for FXI.
FLCH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLCH and FXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer