FLCH vs. DIVI
FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) and DIVI (Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLCH is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index, while DIVI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. FLCH is passively managed, while DIVI is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLCH returned -4.93%/yr vs 13.44%/yr for DIVI. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLCH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for DIVI.
Performance
FLCH vs. DIVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCH achieves a -6.30% return, which is significantly lower than DIVI's 10.89% return.
FLCH
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -2.79%
- YTD
- -6.30%
- 6M
- -7.45%
- 1Y
- 8.36%
- 3Y*
- 10.66%
- 5Y*
- -4.93%
- 10Y*
- —
DIVI
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- YTD
- 10.89%
- 6M
- 13.56%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- 18.22%
- 5Y*
- 13.44%
- 10Y*
- —
FLCH vs. DIVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | -6.30% | 32.55% | 18.00% | -11.21% | -22.74% | -20.87% | 30.09% | 24.32% | -19.52% | 0.91% |
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 10.89% | 34.86% | 1.77% | 18.97% | -1.21% | 16.95% | 1.29% | 22.98% | -6.73% | 0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCH and DIVI is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.52 |
The correlation between FLCH and DIVI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLCH vs. DIVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLCH
DIVI
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
FLCH
DIVI
Financial Services
FLCH
DIVI
Communication Services
FLCH
DIVI
Technology
FLCH
DIVI
Industrials
FLCH
DIVI
Basic Materials
FLCH
DIVI
Healthcare
FLCH
DIVI
Energy
FLCH
DIVI
Consumer Defensive
FLCH
DIVI
Utilities
FLCH
DIVI
Real Estate
FLCH
DIVI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLCH vs. DIVI — Risk / Return Rank
FLCH
DIVI
FLCH vs. DIVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLCH | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.32 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 2.55 | -2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.14 | 9.83 | -8.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLCH | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 1.82 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | 0.88 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.67 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
FLCH vs. DIVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCH drawdown since its inception was -62.09%, which is greater than DIVI's maximum drawdown of -27.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCH and DIVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCH | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.09% | -27.76% | -34.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.52% | -10.54% | -4.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.43% | -14.58% | -10.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.78% | -18.53% | -37.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.95% | -1.01% | -32.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.53% | -3.63% | -26.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.38% | 2.73% | +4.65% |
Volatility
FLCH vs. DIVI - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) has a higher volatility of 6.59% compared to Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) at 5.11%. This indicates that FLCH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLCH | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.59% | 5.11% | +1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.67% | 12.18% | +1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.22% | 14.84% | +4.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.59% | 15.30% | +14.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.91% | 16.46% | +11.45% |
FLCH vs. DIVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLCH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVI's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLCH vs. DIVI - Dividend Comparison
FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than DIVI's 3.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 3.53% | 3.76% | 4.39% | 3.17% | 6.03% | 2.77% | 8.04% | 1.61% | 5.67% | 5.22% | 11.56% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.52% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 2.69% | 1.48% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.01% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLCH and DIVI have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLCH has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to DIVI (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCH dropped -62.09% vs DIVI's -27.76%.
On 5-year performance, DIVI leads with 13.44% vs -4.93% for FLCH. On fees, DIVI is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DIVI has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIVI has performed better with a 13.44% return vs -4.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVI is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLCH.
DIVI has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 2.52% for FLCH.
FLCH is categorized as China Equities, while DIVI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLCH and 0.09% for DIVI.
DIVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLCH and DIVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer