FLCC vs. FDV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FLCC (Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF) and FDV (Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLCC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Federated, while FDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Federated. Both are actively managed. Their -0.32 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FLCC charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FDV.

Performance

FLCC vs. FDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) and Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FLCC

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 1.73%
• 6M: 10.65%
• YTD: 10.61%
• 1Y: 18.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.95%

FDV

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 2.68%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF	$6.37M	$5.52M	$4.30M
FLCC Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF	$1.19M	$831.18K	$771.14K

FLCC vs. FDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FLCC Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF	3.26%
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF	5.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCC and FDV is -0.32, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2026	-0.32

FLCC vs. FDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLCC	FDV
Technology	38.2%	9.5%
Consumer Cyclical	12.0%	7.8%
Financial Services	11.1%	14.4%
Healthcare	10.2%	14.7%
Industrials	10.1%	2.7%
Communication Services	8.6%	1.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	13.3%
Energy	2.2%	8.7%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.4%
Utilities	1.4%	16.1%
Real Estate	1.2%	9.5%

Return for Risk

FLCC vs. FDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLCC

FLCC Risk / Return Rank: 50
FLCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
FLCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
FLCC Omega Ratio Rank: 47
FLCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
FLCC Martin Ratio Rank: 56

FDV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLCC vs. FDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) and Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLCC	FDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.75	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.77	—	—

Drawdowns

FLCC vs. FDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCC drawdown since its inception was -19.18%, which is greater than FDV's maximum drawdown of -3.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCC and FDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCC	FDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.18%	-3.33%	-15.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.54%	+1.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.28%	-0.96%	-1.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.40%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FLCC	FDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.12%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.12%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.23%	13.81%	-0.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.07%	13.81%	+3.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.07%	13.81%	+3.26%

FLCC vs. FDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FDV's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLCC vs. FDV - Dividend Comparison

FLCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than FDV's 0.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF	0.78%	0.00%	0.00%
FLCC Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF	0.46%	0.50%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLCC and FDV in my portfolio?

FLCC and FDV have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FLCC or FDV?

On fees, FLCC is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLCC or FDV?

FLCC is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLCC or FDV?

FDV has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.46% for FLCC.

What is the main difference between FLCC and FDV?

FLCC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FDV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FLCC and 0.50% for FDV.