FLCC vs. CNAV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLCC (Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF) and CNAV (Mohr Company Nav ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FLCC returned 21.79% vs 72.64% for CNAV. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLCC charges 0.29%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for CNAV.

Performance

FLCC vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCC achieves a 9.03% return, which is significantly lower than CNAV's 47.26% return.

FLCC

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 3.66%
• YTD: 9.03%
• 6M: 9.76%
• 1Y: 21.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CNAV

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 21.60%
• YTD: 47.26%
• 6M: 48.02%
• 1Y: 72.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCC vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FLCC Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF	9.03%	16.61%	5.22%
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	47.26%	16.80%	6.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCC and CNAV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024	0.78

The correlation between FLCC and CNAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FLCC vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCC

FLCC Risk / Return Rank: 51
FLCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FLCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
FLCC Omega Ratio Rank: 50
FLCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
FLCC Martin Ratio Rank: 56

CNAV

CNAV Risk / Return Rank: 87
CNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
CNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 81
CNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCC vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLCC	CNAV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	2.91	-1.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	3.62	-1.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.48	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.35	5.63	-3.28
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.54	24.09	-14.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLCC vs. CNAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCC Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the CNAV Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCC and CNAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLCC	CNAV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	2.91	-1.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.16	1.62	-0.46

Drawdowns

FLCC vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCC drawdown since its inception was -19.18%, smaller than the maximum CNAV drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCC and CNAV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCC	CNAV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.18%	-30.06%	+10.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.31%	-12.97%	+3.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	0.00%	-0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.34%	-5.42%	+3.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.29%	3.02%	-0.73%

Volatility

FLCC vs. CNAV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) is 2.62%, while Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) has a volatility of 12.28%. This indicates that FLCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLCC	CNAV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.62%	12.28%	-9.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.52%	21.02%	-11.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.68%	25.08%	-12.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.37%	27.16%	-9.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.37%	27.16%	-9.79%

FLCC vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLCC vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison

FLCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, while CNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLCC Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF	0.46%	0.50%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLCC and CNAV in my portfolio?

FLCC and CNAV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLCC or CNAV?

CNAV has higher volatility (12.28%) compared to FLCC (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCC dropped -19.18% vs CNAV's -30.06%.

Which ETF is better, FLCC or CNAV?

On 1-year performance, CNAV leads with 72.64% vs 21.79% for FLCC. On fees, FLCC is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FLCC has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLCC or CNAV?

Over the 1-year period, CNAV has performed better with a 72.64% return vs 21.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLCC or CNAV?

FLCC is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLCC or CNAV?

FLCC has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.00% for CNAV.

What is the main difference between FLCC and CNAV?

They also come from different issuers: Federated Hermes and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FLCC and 1.31% for CNAV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CNAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.