FLCA vs. XLP
FLCA (Franklin FTSE Canada ETF) and XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLCA is a Canada Equities fund tracking the FTSE Canada RIC Capped Index, while XLP is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLCA returned 11.53%/yr vs 6.68%/yr for XLP. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLCA charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLP.
Performance
FLCA vs. XLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCA achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly lower than XLP's 9.13% return.
FLCA
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- YTD
- 7.29%
- 6M
- 6.20%
- 1Y
- 27.89%
- 3Y*
- 21.78%
- 5Y*
- 11.53%
- 10Y*
- —
XLP
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- 9.13%
- 6M
- 9.37%
- 1Y
- 5.70%
- 3Y*
- 7.18%
- 5Y*
- 6.68%
- 10Y*
- 7.51%
FLCA vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCA Franklin FTSE Canada ETF | 7.29% | 34.62% | 13.02% | 14.71% | -11.93% | 28.67% | 6.31% | 28.42% | -15.55% | 2.65% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 9.13% | 1.52% | 12.20% | -0.82% | -0.81% | 17.20% | 10.11% | 27.43% | -8.07% | 7.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCA and XLP is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FLCA and XLP has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FLCA vs. XLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLCA
XLP
Financial Services
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
-
Financial Services
FLCA
XLP
-
Energy
FLCA
XLP
-
Basic Materials
FLCA
XLP
-
Industrials
FLCA
XLP
-
Technology
FLCA
XLP
-
Consumer Cyclical
FLCA
XLP
Consumer Defensive
FLCA
XLP
Utilities
FLCA
XLP
-
Communication Services
FLCA
XLP
-
Real Estate
FLCA
XLP
-
Healthcare
FLCA
-
XLP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLCA vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank
FLCA
XLP
FLCA vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLCA | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.08 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 0.59 | +2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.08 | 1.12 | +11.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLCA vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCA drawdown since its inception was -41.51%, which is greater than XLP's maximum drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCA and XLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCA | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.51% | -35.90% | -5.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.55% | -9.69% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.58% | -12.39% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.23% | -16.30% | -7.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.61% | -5.82% | +3.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.88% | -7.06% | +1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 5.09% | -2.95% |
Volatility
FLCA vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) is 4.45%, while State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that FLCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLCA | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | 5.13% | -0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.54% | 10.52% | +1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.35% | 13.13% | +1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.77% | 13.36% | +3.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.03% | 14.77% | +4.26% |
FLCA vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLCA has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLCA vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison
FLCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than XLP's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCA Franklin FTSE Canada ETF | 1.02% | 1.85% | 2.50% | 2.49% | 2.20% | 2.02% | 2.49% | 2.29% | 3.03% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.62% | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLCA and XLP have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLP has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to FLCA (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCA dropped -41.51% vs XLP's -35.90%.
On 5-year performance, FLCA leads with 11.53% vs 6.68% for XLP. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FLCA has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLCA has performed better with a 11.53% return vs 6.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for FLCA.
XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 1.02% for FLCA.
FLCA is categorized as Canada Equities, while XLP is Consumer Staples Equities. FLCA tracks FTSE Canada RIC Capped Index, while XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLCA and 0.08% for XLP.
FLCA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLCA and XLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer