FLCA vs. SGDM

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FLCA (Franklin FTSE Canada ETF) and SGDM (Sprott Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLCA is a Canada Equities fund tracking the FTSE Canada RIC Capped Index, while SGDM is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLCA returned 11.96%/yr vs 19.03%/yr for SGDM. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLCA charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SGDM.

Performance

FLCA vs. SGDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCA achieves a 10.02% return, which is significantly higher than SGDM's 3.12% return.

FLCA

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: 3.13%
• YTD: 10.02%
• 6M: 12.97%
• 1Y: 31.90%
• 3Y*: 22.71%
• 5Y*: 11.96%
• 10Y*: —

SGDM

• 1D: 1.69%
• 1M: 1.80%
• YTD: 3.12%
• 6M: 8.86%
• 1Y: 59.22%
• 3Y*: 39.67%
• 5Y*: 19.03%
• 10Y*: 12.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCA vs. SGDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLCA Franklin FTSE Canada ETF	10.02%	34.62%	13.02%	14.71%	-11.93%	28.67%	6.31%	28.42%	-15.55%	2.49%
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF	3.12%	153.46%	12.14%	2.34%	-8.23%	-9.15%	21.85%	44.27%	-15.14%	1.73%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCA and SGDM is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017	0.38

Over the past year, FLCA and SGDM have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.38, meaning their price movements have been converging.

FLCA vs. SGDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLCA	SGDM
Financial Services	39.0%	-
Energy	18.0%	-
Basic Materials	15.7%	100.0%
Industrials	10.4%	-
Technology	7.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	-
Utilities	2.3%	-
Communication Services	0.5%	-
Real Estate	0.2%	-
Healthcare	-	-

Return for Risk

FLCA vs. SGDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCA

FLCA Risk / Return Rank: 72
FLCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FLCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
FLCA Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FLCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FLCA Martin Ratio Rank: 79

SGDM

SGDM Risk / Return Rank: 37
SGDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
SGDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
SGDM Omega Ratio Rank: 38
SGDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
SGDM Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCA vs. SGDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLCA	SGDM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	1.33	+0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	1.71	+1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.24	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.75	1.98	+1.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.30	4.98	+10.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLCA vs. SGDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCA Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the SGDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCA and SGDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLCA	SGDM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.29	1.33	+0.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.53	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.27	+0.35

Drawdowns

FLCA vs. SGDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCA drawdown since its inception was -41.51%, smaller than the maximum SGDM drawdown of -54.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCA and SGDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCA	SGDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.51%	-54.95%	+13.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.55%	-30.04%	+21.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.58%	-30.04%	+17.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.23%	-45.06%	+20.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-49.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-24.68%	+24.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.90%	-25.46%	+19.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	11.94%	-9.85%

Volatility

FLCA vs. SGDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) is 3.72%, while Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) has a volatility of 14.53%. This indicates that FLCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLCA	SGDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.72%	14.53%	-10.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.23%	36.91%	-25.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.00%	44.86%	-30.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.72%	35.78%	-19.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.05%	36.81%	-17.76%

FLCA vs. SGDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCA has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SGDM's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLCA vs. SGDM - Dividend Comparison

FLCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than SGDM's 1.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLCA Franklin FTSE Canada ETF	1.69%	1.85%	2.50%	2.49%	2.20%	2.02%	2.49%	2.29%	3.03%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF	1.01%	1.04%	1.04%	1.39%	1.42%	1.33%	0.30%	0.25%	0.50%	0.58%	0.02%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLCA and SGDM in my portfolio?

FLCA and SGDM have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLCA or SGDM?

SGDM has higher volatility (14.53%) compared to FLCA (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCA dropped -41.51% vs SGDM's -54.95%.

Which ETF is better, FLCA or SGDM?

On 5-year performance, SGDM leads with 19.03% vs 11.96% for FLCA. On fees, FLCA is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLCA has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLCA or SGDM?

Over the 5-year period, SGDM has performed better with a 19.03% return vs 11.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLCA or SGDM?

FLCA is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SGDM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLCA or SGDM?

FLCA has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 1.01% for SGDM.

What is the main difference between FLCA and SGDM?

FLCA is categorized as Canada Equities, while SGDM is Materials. FLCA tracks FTSE Canada RIC Capped Index, while SGDM tracks Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLCA and 0.50% for SGDM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLCA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.