FLCA vs. SGDM
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM).
FLCA and SGDM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLCA is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Canada RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. SGDM is a passively managed fund by Sprott that tracks the performance of the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. It was launched on Jul 15, 2014. Both FLCA and SGDM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FLCA vs. SGDM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLCA vs. SGDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCA Franklin FTSE Canada ETF | 2.36% | 34.62% | 13.02% | 14.71% | -11.93% | 28.67% | 6.31% | 28.42% | -15.55% | 2.49% |
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF | 13.63% | 153.46% | 12.14% | 2.34% | -8.23% | -9.15% | 21.85% | 44.27% | -15.14% | 1.73% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCA achieves a 2.36% return, which is significantly lower than SGDM's 13.63% return.
FLCA
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- -4.87%
- YTD
- 2.36%
- 6M
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 34.23%
- 3Y*
- 19.96%
- 5Y*
- 12.56%
- 10Y*
- —
SGDM
- 1D
- 4.81%
- 1M
- -17.00%
- YTD
- 13.63%
- 6M
- 27.33%
- 1Y
- 111.01%
- 3Y*
- 42.57%
- 5Y*
- 24.69%
- 10Y*
- 16.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLCA vs. SGDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLCA has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SGDM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLCA vs. SGDM — Risk / Return Rank
FLCA
SGDM
FLCA vs. SGDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLCA | SGDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.06 | 2.44 | -0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.73 | 2.58 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.39 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 3.69 | -0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.48 | 13.29 | +2.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLCA | SGDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 2.44 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.70 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.30 | +0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCA and SGDM is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FLCA vs. SGDM - Dividend Comparison
FLCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than SGDM's 0.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCA Franklin FTSE Canada ETF | 1.81% | 1.85% | 2.50% | 2.49% | 2.20% | 2.02% | 2.49% | 2.29% | 3.03% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF | 0.92% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 0.30% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.58% | 0.02% | 1.47% |
Drawdowns
FLCA vs. SGDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCA drawdown since its inception was -41.51%, smaller than the maximum SGDM drawdown of -54.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCA and SGDM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCA | SGDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.51% | -54.95% | +13.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.68% | -30.04% | +19.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.23% | -45.06% | +20.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.89% | -17.00% | +12.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.00% | -25.53% | +19.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 8.33% | -6.03% |
Volatility
FLCA vs. SGDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) is 5.71%, while Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) has a volatility of 16.86%. This indicates that FLCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLCA | SGDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 16.86% | -11.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.58% | 38.34% | -26.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.75% | 45.74% | -28.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 35.29% | -18.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.14% | 37.07% | -17.93% |