PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCA vs. SCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCA vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCA achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 7.91% return.


FLCA

1D
0.72%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
7.33%
6M
6.14%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
21.31%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*

SCHX

1D
-0.07%
1M
-1.94%
YTD
7.91%
6M
6.56%
1Y
21.54%
3Y*
20.85%
5Y*
12.33%
10Y*
15.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCA vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLCA
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF
7.33%34.62%13.02%14.71%-11.93%28.67%6.31%28.42%-15.55%2.65%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
7.91%17.46%24.88%26.84%-19.41%26.81%20.81%31.22%-4.66%3.79%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCA and SCHX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.70

The correlation between FLCA and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLCA vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLCA
SCHX

Financial Services

40.9%
10.4%

Energy

16.8%
3.1%

Basic Materials

14.9%
1.8%

Industrials

10.3%
8.8%

Technology

7.8%
37.8%

Consumer Cyclical

3.3%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
4.5%

Utilities

2.2%
2.6%

Communication Services

0.5%
9.8%

Real Estate

0.2%
2.0%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Financial Services

FLCA
40.9%
SCHX
10.4%

Energy

FLCA
16.8%
SCHX
3.1%

Basic Materials

FLCA
14.9%
SCHX
1.8%

Industrials

FLCA
10.3%
SCHX
8.8%

Technology

FLCA
7.8%
SCHX
37.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FLCA
3.3%
SCHX
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

FLCA
3.0%
SCHX
4.5%

Utilities

FLCA
2.2%
SCHX
2.6%

Communication Services

FLCA
0.5%
SCHX
9.8%

Real Estate

FLCA
0.2%
SCHX
2.0%

Healthcare

FLCA

-

SCHX
8.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCA vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCA
FLCA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FLCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCA Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCA Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHX
SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCA vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLCASCHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.31

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

2.40

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.08

10.41

+2.67

FLCA vs. SCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCA Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the SCHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCA and SCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLCA vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCA drawdown since its inception was -41.51%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCA and SCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCASCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.51%

-34.33%

-7.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.55%

-9.02%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.58%

-19.04%

+6.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.23%

-25.41%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.57%

-3.22%

+0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-3.96%

-1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

2.07%

+0.08%

Volatility

FLCA vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) have volatilities of 4.56% and 4.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCASCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

4.80%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.51%

9.88%

+1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.37%

12.57%

+1.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.78%

17.22%

-0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.02%

18.16%

+0.86%

FLCA vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCA has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLCA vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison

FLCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than SCHX's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCA
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF
1.02%1.85%2.50%2.49%2.20%2.02%2.49%2.29%3.03%0.09%0.00%0.00%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
1.05%1.09%1.22%1.39%1.64%1.22%1.64%1.82%2.02%1.70%1.92%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLCA and SCHX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHX has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to FLCA (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCA dropped -41.51% vs SCHX's -34.33%.

On 5-year performance, SCHX leads with 12.33% vs 11.48% for FLCA. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FLCA has been the lower-risk option at 4.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 12.33% return vs 11.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for FLCA.

SCHX has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 1.02% for FLCA.

FLCA is categorized as Canada Equities, while SCHX is Large Cap Blend Equities. FLCA tracks FTSE Canada RIC Capped Index, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLCA and 0.03% for SCHX.

FLCA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCA and SCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer