FLCA vs. SCHX
FLCA (Franklin FTSE Canada ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLCA is a Canada Equities fund tracking the FTSE Canada RIC Capped Index, while SCHX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLCA returned 11.96%/yr vs 13.39%/yr for SCHX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLCA charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
FLCA vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCA achieves a 10.02% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 11.20% return.
FLCA
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 3.13%
- YTD
- 10.02%
- 6M
- 12.97%
- 1Y
- 31.90%
- 3Y*
- 22.71%
- 5Y*
- 11.96%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 4.70%
- YTD
- 11.20%
- 6M
- 10.96%
- 1Y
- 27.92%
- 3Y*
- 22.63%
- 5Y*
- 13.39%
- 10Y*
- 15.41%
FLCA vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCA Franklin FTSE Canada ETF | 10.02% | 34.62% | 13.02% | 14.71% | -11.93% | 28.67% | 6.31% | 28.42% | -15.55% | 2.49% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 11.20% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 31.22% | -4.66% | 3.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCA and SCHX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.70 |
The correlation between FLCA and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLCA vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLCA
SCHX
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
FLCA
SCHX
Energy
FLCA
SCHX
Basic Materials
FLCA
SCHX
Industrials
FLCA
SCHX
Technology
FLCA
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
FLCA
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
FLCA
SCHX
Utilities
FLCA
SCHX
Communication Services
FLCA
SCHX
Real Estate
FLCA
SCHX
Healthcare
FLCA
-
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLCA vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
FLCA
SCHX
FLCA vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLCA | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.42 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | 3.11 | +0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.30 | 14.13 | +1.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLCA | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | 2.34 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.79 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.85 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
FLCA vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCA drawdown since its inception was -41.51%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCA and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCA | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.51% | -34.33% | -7.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.55% | -9.02% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.58% | -19.04% | +6.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.23% | -25.41% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.27% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.90% | -3.97% | -1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 1.98% | +0.11% |
Volatility
FLCA vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) at 2.86%. This indicates that FLCA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLCA | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 2.86% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.23% | 9.03% | +2.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.00% | 11.98% | +2.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 17.12% | -0.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 18.14% | +0.91% |
FLCA vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLCA has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLCA vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
FLCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than SCHX's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCA Franklin FTSE Canada ETF | 1.69% | 1.85% | 2.50% | 2.49% | 2.20% | 2.02% | 2.49% | 2.29% | 3.03% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.00% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLCA and SCHX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLCA has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to SCHX (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCA dropped -41.51% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 5-year performance, SCHX leads with 13.39% vs 11.96% for FLCA. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHX has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 13.39% return vs 11.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for FLCA.
FLCA has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 1.00% for SCHX.
FLCA is categorized as Canada Equities, while SCHX is Large Cap Blend Equities. FLCA tracks FTSE Canada RIC Capped Index, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLCA and 0.03% for SCHX.
SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLCA and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer