PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCA vs. FLGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCA vs. FLGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCA achieves a 10.02% return, which is significantly higher than FLGR's 1.25% return.


FLCA

1D
1.41%
1M
3.13%
YTD
10.02%
6M
12.97%
1Y
31.90%
3Y*
22.71%
5Y*
11.96%
10Y*

FLGR

1D
0.81%
1M
1.63%
YTD
1.25%
6M
4.52%
1Y
3.05%
3Y*
18.11%
5Y*
6.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCA vs. FLGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLCA
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF
10.02%34.62%13.02%14.71%-11.93%28.67%6.31%28.42%-15.55%2.49%
FLGR
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF
1.25%36.67%10.63%24.22%-21.96%5.40%12.11%19.99%-21.50%-0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCA and FLGR is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.65

The correlation between FLCA and FLGR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLCA vs. FLGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLCA
FLGR

Financial Services

39.0%
21.7%

Energy

18.0%

-

Basic Materials

15.7%
5.9%

Industrials

10.4%
30.5%

Technology

7.6%
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

3.3%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
1.4%

Utilities

2.3%
5.0%

Communication Services

0.5%
6.3%

Real Estate

0.2%
1.3%

Healthcare

-

5.8%

Financial Services

FLCA
39.0%
FLGR
21.7%

Energy

FLCA
18.0%
FLGR

-

Basic Materials

FLCA
15.7%
FLGR
5.9%

Industrials

FLCA
10.4%
FLGR
30.5%

Technology

FLCA
7.6%
FLGR
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FLCA
3.3%
FLGR
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

FLCA
2.9%
FLGR
1.4%

Utilities

FLCA
2.3%
FLGR
5.0%

Communication Services

FLCA
0.5%
FLGR
6.3%

Real Estate

FLCA
0.2%
FLGR
1.3%

Healthcare

FLCA

-

FLGR
5.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCA vs. FLGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCA
FLCA Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FLCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCA Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FLGR
FLGR Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FLGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGR Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGR Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCA vs. FLGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLCAFLGRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.05

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

0.21

+3.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.30

0.61

+14.69

FLCA vs. FLGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCA Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the FLGR Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCA and FLGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLCAFLGRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

0.18

+2.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.33

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.28

+0.33

Drawdowns

FLCA vs. FLGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCA drawdown since its inception was -41.51%, smaller than the maximum FLGR drawdown of -46.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCA and FLGR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCAFLGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.51%

-46.21%

+4.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.55%

-14.44%

+5.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.58%

-15.53%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.23%

-43.54%

+19.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-3.49%

+3.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.90%

-12.37%

+6.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

5.03%

-2.94%

Volatility

FLCA vs. FLGR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) is 3.72%, while Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) has a volatility of 5.90%. This indicates that FLCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCAFLGRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

5.90%

-2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.23%

14.03%

-2.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.00%

17.19%

-3.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.72%

20.26%

-3.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.05%

21.43%

-2.38%

FLCA vs. FLGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLCA and FLGR have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLCA vs. FLGR - Dividend Comparison

FLCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, which matches FLGR's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLCA
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF
1.69%1.85%2.50%2.49%2.20%2.02%2.49%2.29%3.03%0.09%
FLGR
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF
1.70%1.72%2.40%2.99%3.50%2.67%2.61%2.52%3.06%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLCA and FLGR have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLGR has higher volatility (5.90%) compared to FLCA (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCA dropped -41.51% vs FLGR's -46.21%.

On 5-year performance, FLCA leads with 11.96% vs 6.62% for FLGR. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, FLCA has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLCA has performed better with a 11.96% return vs 6.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLCA and FLGR have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

FLGR has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 1.69% for FLCA.

FLCA is categorized as Canada Equities, while FLGR is Europe Equities. FLCA tracks FTSE Canada RIC Capped Index, while FLGR tracks FTSE Germany RIC Capped Index.

FLCA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCA and FLGR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer