FLC vs. FAFCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C (FAFCX).
FLC is an actively managed fund by Flaherty & Crumrine. It was launched on Aug 29, 2003. FAFCX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Nov 3, 1997.
Performance
FLC vs. FAFCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLC vs. FAFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | -3.43% | 12.38% | 23.05% | -0.83% | -25.11% | 2.82% | 14.12% | 38.65% | -14.14% | 17.00% |
FAFCX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C | -9.61% | 14.05% | 37.55% | 13.19% | -9.63% | 31.91% | -1.00% | 32.80% | -16.73% | 19.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLC achieves a -3.43% return, which is significantly higher than FAFCX's -9.61% return. Over the past 10 years, FLC has underperformed FAFCX with an annualized return of 5.33%, while FAFCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.87% annualized return.
FLC
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- -5.90%
- YTD
- -3.43%
- 6M
- -3.32%
- 1Y
- 6.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- -0.62%
- 10Y*
- 5.33%
FAFCX
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -5.44%
- YTD
- -9.61%
- 6M
- -6.34%
- 1Y
- 3.57%
- 3Y*
- 19.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.13%
- 10Y*
- 11.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLC vs. FAFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLC has a 1.64% expense ratio, which is lower than FAFCX's 1.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLC vs. FAFCX — Risk / Return Rank
FLC
FAFCX
FLC vs. FAFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C (FAFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLC | FAFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.55 | 0.21 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.75 | 0.42 | +0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.06 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 0.16 | +0.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.71 | 0.50 | +2.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLC | FAFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 0.21 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.48 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.50 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.26 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLC and FAFCX is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FLC vs. FAFCX - Dividend Comparison
FLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, which matches FAFCX's 7.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | 7.36% | 6.81% | 6.62% | 7.38% | 8.95% | 6.86% | 6.27% | 6.31% | 8.34% | 7.22% | 8.20% | 8.51% |
FAFCX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C | 7.38% | 6.67% | 9.04% | 1.58% | 5.50% | 3.78% | 1.85% | 0.45% | 3.33% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.28% |
Drawdowns
FLC vs. FAFCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLC drawdown since its inception was -76.79%, roughly equal to the maximum FAFCX drawdown of -76.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLC and FAFCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLC | FAFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.79% | -76.00% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.69% | -14.43% | +5.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.14% | -25.75% | -14.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.27% | -46.01% | -9.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -12.35% | +5.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.92% | -18.88% | +7.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 4.69% | -2.43% |
Volatility
FLC vs. FAFCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) is 4.25%, while Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C (FAFCX) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that FLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAFCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLC | FAFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 4.53% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.78% | 12.45% | -6.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.34% | 21.15% | -9.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.23% | 21.05% | -6.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.06% | 23.79% | -1.73% |