PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLBR vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLBR vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLBR achieves a 20.73% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 22.47% return.


FLBR

1D
-0.70%
1M
6.17%
6M
1.18%
YTD
20.73%
1Y
45.07%
3Y*
12.92%
5Y*
8.40%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.52%

VGT

1D
1.76%
1M
0.44%
6M
22.59%
YTD
22.47%
1Y
37.19%
3Y*
29.10%
5Y*
18.09%
10Y*
24.01%
ALL TIME*
14.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.31M$2.47M$3.89M
$454.00M$507.98M$575.23M

FLBR vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLBR
Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF
20.73%45.57%-27.58%33.19%10.44%-16.78%-20.13%28.47%-2.13%2.27%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
22.47%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%0.35%

Correlation

The correlation between FLBR and VGT is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.35

FLBR vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLBR
VGT

Financial Services

26.3%
0.5%

Energy

17.8%
0.3%

Basic Materials

15.6%
0.0%

Utilities

15.0%

-

Industrials

12.4%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

2.6%
0.1%

Healthcare

2.5%
0.0%

Communication Services

1.8%
0.5%

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Technology

0.7%
98.6%

Financial Services

FLBR
26.3%
VGT
0.5%

Energy

FLBR
17.8%
VGT
0.3%

Basic Materials

FLBR
15.6%
VGT
0.0%

Utilities

FLBR
15.0%
VGT

-

Industrials

FLBR
12.4%
VGT
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

FLBR
4.6%
VGT

-

Consumer Cyclical

FLBR
2.6%
VGT
0.1%

Healthcare

FLBR
2.5%
VGT
0.0%

Communication Services

FLBR
1.8%
VGT
0.5%

Real Estate

FLBR
0.9%
VGT

-

Technology

FLBR
0.7%
VGT
98.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLBR vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLBR
FLBR Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FLBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLBR Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FLBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLBR Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLBR vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLBRVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.26

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

2.28

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.86

6.12

-0.26

FLBR vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLBR Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLBR and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLBR vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLBR drawdown since its inception was -57.42%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLBR and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLBRVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.42%

-54.63%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.38%

-16.40%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.97%

-27.23%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.31%

-35.07%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.75%

-8.34%

-3.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.55%

-7.95%

-10.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.71%

6.09%

+1.62%

Volatility

FLBR vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) is 6.47%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 8.34%. This indicates that FLBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLBRVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.47%

8.34%

-1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.20%

20.11%

-0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.29%

24.25%

+1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.46%

25.85%

+1.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.89%

24.90%

+7.99%

FLBR vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLBR has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLBR vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

FLBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, more than VGT's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLBR
Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF
5.70%7.71%7.68%8.84%11.99%8.71%2.32%3.42%3.72%0.42%0.00%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.38%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLBR and VGT have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (8.34%) compared to FLBR (6.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLBR dropped -57.42% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 5-year performance, VGT leads with 18.09% vs 8.40% for FLBR. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLBR has been the lower-risk option at 6.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VGT has performed better with a 18.09% return vs 8.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLBR.

FLBR has the higher dividend yield at 5.70%, compared with 0.38% for VGT.

FLBR is categorized as Latin America Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. FLBR tracks FTSE Brazil RIC Capped Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLBR and 0.09% for VGT.

FLBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLBR and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer