FLBR vs. FLCH
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH).
FLBR and FLCH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLBR is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Brazil RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2017. FLCH is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. Both FLBR and FLCH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FLBR vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLBR vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLBR Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF | 25.72% | 45.57% | -27.58% | 33.19% | 10.44% | -16.78% | -20.13% | 28.47% | -2.13% | 2.27% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | -5.65% | 32.55% | 18.00% | -11.21% | -22.74% | -20.87% | 30.09% | 24.32% | -19.52% | 0.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLBR achieves a 25.72% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -5.65% return.
FLBR
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 25.72%
- 6M
- 33.59%
- 1Y
- 55.44%
- 3Y*
- 21.82%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- —
FLCH
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -4.32%
- YTD
- -5.65%
- 6M
- -12.56%
- 1Y
- 7.43%
- 3Y*
- 7.60%
- 5Y*
- -4.85%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLBR vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FLBR and FLCH have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FLBR vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank
FLBR
FLCH
FLBR vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLBR | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.14 | 0.32 | +1.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.70 | 0.59 | +2.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.08 | +0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.85 | 0.45 | +4.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.62 | 1.29 | +12.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLBR | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 0.32 | +1.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | -0.16 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.02 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLBR and FLCH is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FLBR vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison
FLBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.13%, more than FLCH's 2.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLBR Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF | 6.13% | 7.71% | 7.68% | 8.84% | 11.99% | 8.71% | 2.32% | 3.42% | 3.72% | 0.42% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.50% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 2.69% | 1.48% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.01% |
Drawdowns
FLBR vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLBR drawdown since its inception was -57.42%, smaller than the maximum FLCH drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLBR and FLCH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLBR | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.42% | -62.09% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.69% | -16.65% | +4.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.74% | -56.06% | +23.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.44% | -33.49% | +32.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.87% | -30.50% | +11.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.16% | 6.02% | -1.86% |
Volatility
FLBR vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) has a higher volatility of 11.31% compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) at 6.44%. This indicates that FLBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLBR | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.31% | 6.44% | +4.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.89% | 13.92% | +5.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.02% | 23.03% | +2.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.73% | 29.58% | -1.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.23% | 28.06% | +5.17% |