FLBDX vs. FLFGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Meeder Tactical Income Fund (FLBDX) and Meeder Global Allocation Fund (FLFGX).
FLBDX is managed by Meeder Funds. It was launched on Jun 29, 2011. FLFGX is managed by Meeder Funds. It was launched on Jan 30, 2006.
Performance
FLBDX vs. FLFGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLBDX vs. FLFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLBDX Meeder Tactical Income Fund | 0.16% | 7.28% | 6.64% | 7.10% | -5.71% | -2.01% | 7.46% | 7.24% | -1.67% | 3.72% |
FLFGX Meeder Global Allocation Fund | -0.86% | 18.82% | 22.53% | 15.37% | -12.93% | 12.57% | 2.99% | 13.17% | -6.93% | 22.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLBDX achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly higher than FLFGX's -0.86% return. Over the past 10 years, FLBDX has underperformed FLFGX with an annualized return of 3.16%, while FLFGX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.52% annualized return.
FLBDX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 1.41%
- 1Y
- 4.93%
- 3Y*
- 6.55%
- 5Y*
- 3.02%
- 10Y*
- 3.16%
FLFGX
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -5.29%
- YTD
- -0.86%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 17.00%
- 3Y*
- 16.58%
- 5Y*
- 9.12%
- 10Y*
- 8.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLBDX vs. FLFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLBDX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is lower than FLFGX's 1.81% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLBDX vs. FLFGX — Risk / Return Rank
FLBDX
FLFGX
FLBDX vs. FLFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meeder Tactical Income Fund (FLBDX) and Meeder Global Allocation Fund (FLFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLBDX | FLFGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.05 | 1.11 | +0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.86 | 1.67 | +1.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.24 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 1.61 | +0.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.22 | 7.47 | +0.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLBDX | FLFGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 1.11 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.14 | 0.61 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.08 | 0.61 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.29 | +0.67 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLBDX and FLFGX is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FLBDX vs. FLFGX - Dividend Comparison
FLBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, less than FLFGX's 14.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLBDX Meeder Tactical Income Fund | 4.62% | 4.67% | 4.35% | 3.57% | 1.68% | 1.56% | 1.81% | 2.32% | 2.03% | 2.70% | 2.90% | 2.78% |
FLFGX Meeder Global Allocation Fund | 14.28% | 14.35% | 25.20% | 1.64% | 0.77% | 11.13% | 2.22% | 2.12% | 5.05% | 1.41% | 1.14% | 3.15% |
Drawdowns
FLBDX vs. FLFGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLBDX drawdown since its inception was -8.74%, smaller than the maximum FLFGX drawdown of -60.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLBDX and FLFGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLBDX | FLFGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.74% | -60.31% | +51.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.20% | -10.80% | +8.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.16% | -28.54% | +20.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.74% | -28.54% | +19.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -6.39% | +5.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.95% | -11.56% | +9.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.65% | 2.33% | -1.68% |
Volatility
FLBDX vs. FLFGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Meeder Tactical Income Fund (FLBDX) is 1.11%, while Meeder Global Allocation Fund (FLFGX) has a volatility of 5.87%. This indicates that FLBDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLFGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLBDX | FLFGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.11% | 5.87% | -4.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.65% | 9.24% | -7.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53% | 15.71% | -13.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.66% | 15.14% | -12.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.94% | 13.90% | -10.96% |