FLBDX vs. FLDGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLBDX (Meeder Tactical Income Fund) and FLDGX (Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund) are both mutual funds - FLBDX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund managed by Meeder Funds, while FLDGX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Meeder Funds. Over the past 10 years, FLBDX returned 3.18%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for FLDGX. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLBDX charges 1.11%/yr vs 1.32%/yr for FLDGX.

Performance

FLBDX vs. FLDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meeder Tactical Income Fund (FLBDX) and Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund (FLDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLBDX achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly lower than FLDGX's 12.36% return. Over the past 10 years, FLBDX has underperformed FLDGX with an annualized return of 3.18%, while FLDGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.43% annualized return.

FLBDX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 2.07%
• 6M: 2.18%
• 1Y: 7.84%
• 3Y*: 7.19%
• 5Y*: 3.26%
• 10Y*: 3.18%

FLDGX

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 5.11%
• YTD: 12.36%
• 6M: 12.95%
• 1Y: 27.10%
• 3Y*: 24.06%
• 5Y*: 13.65%
• 10Y*: 13.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLBDX vs. FLDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLBDX Meeder Tactical Income Fund	2.07%	7.28%	6.64%	7.10%	-5.71%	-2.01%	7.46%	7.24%	-1.67%	3.72%
FLDGX Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund	12.36%	17.24%	30.96%	20.70%	-15.46%	19.51%	15.41%	24.00%	-8.65%	21.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FLBDX and FLDGX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2011	0.25

Over the past year, FLBDX and FLDGX have become more correlated (0.64) than their long-term average of 0.25, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

FLBDX vs. FLDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLBDX

FLBDX Risk / Return Rank: 93
FLBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FLBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FLBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FLBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FLBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

FLDGX

FLDGX Risk / Return Rank: 62
FLDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
FLDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FLDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FLDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
FLDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLBDX vs. FLDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meeder Tactical Income Fund (FLBDX) and Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund (FLDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLBDX	FLDGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.32	2.30	+1.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.12	3.23	+1.89
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.71	1.42	+0.29
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.77	3.00	+1.77
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	19.19	13.68	+5.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLBDX vs. FLDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLBDX Sharpe Ratio is 3.32, which is higher than the FLDGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLBDX and FLDGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLBDX	FLDGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.32	2.30	+1.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.23	0.72	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.09	0.73	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.00	0.32	+0.68

Drawdowns

FLBDX vs. FLDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLBDX drawdown since its inception was -8.74%, smaller than the maximum FLDGX drawdown of -58.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLBDX and FLDGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLBDX	FLDGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.74%	-58.72%	+49.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.65%	-9.17%	+7.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.51%	-16.64%	+14.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.16%	-33.96%	+25.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-8.74%	-33.96%	+25.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.93%	-16.83%	+14.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.41%	2.01%	-1.60%

Volatility

FLBDX vs. FLDGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Meeder Tactical Income Fund (FLBDX) is 0.75%, while Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund (FLDGX) has a volatility of 3.34%. This indicates that FLBDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLBDX	FLDGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.75%	3.34%	-2.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.81%	9.37%	-7.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37%	11.96%	-9.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.67%	18.93%	-16.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.94%	18.50%	-15.56%

FLBDX vs. FLDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLBDX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is lower than FLDGX's 1.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLBDX vs. FLDGX - Dividend Comparison

FLBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than FLDGX's 6.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLBDX Meeder Tactical Income Fund	4.58%	4.67%	4.35%	3.57%	1.68%	1.56%	1.81%	2.32%	2.03%	2.70%	2.90%	2.78%
FLDGX Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund	6.72%	7.53%	29.01%	0.99%	3.71%	14.92%	2.21%	2.21%	1.30%	8.48%	1.44%	3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLBDX and FLDGX in my portfolio?

FLBDX and FLDGX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLBDX or FLDGX?

FLDGX has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to FLBDX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLBDX dropped -8.74% vs FLDGX's -58.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLBDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.