FLFGX vs. FLRUX
Compare and contrast key facts about Meeder Global Allocation Fund (FLFGX) and Meeder Conservative Allocation Fund (FLRUX).
FLFGX is managed by Meeder Funds. It was launched on Jan 30, 2006. FLRUX is managed by Meeder Funds. It was launched on Jun 20, 1995.
Performance
FLFGX vs. FLRUX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLFGX vs. FLRUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLFGX Meeder Global Allocation Fund | -0.86% | 18.82% | 22.53% | 15.37% | -12.93% | 12.57% | 2.99% | 13.17% | -6.93% | 22.34% |
FLRUX Meeder Conservative Allocation Fund | -0.70% | 8.55% | 6.53% | 9.67% | -10.23% | 4.64% | 6.28% | 10.25% | -2.61% | 7.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLFGX achieves a -0.86% return, which is significantly lower than FLRUX's -0.70% return. Over the past 10 years, FLFGX has outperformed FLRUX with an annualized return of 8.52%, while FLRUX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.12% annualized return.
FLFGX
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -5.29%
- YTD
- -0.86%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 17.00%
- 3Y*
- 16.58%
- 5Y*
- 9.12%
- 10Y*
- 8.52%
FLRUX
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- -2.92%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 0.36%
- 1Y
- 6.82%
- 3Y*
- 7.27%
- 5Y*
- 3.25%
- 10Y*
- 5.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLFGX vs. FLRUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLFGX has a 1.81% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRUX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLFGX vs. FLRUX — Risk / Return Rank
FLFGX
FLRUX
FLFGX vs. FLRUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meeder Global Allocation Fund (FLFGX) and Meeder Conservative Allocation Fund (FLRUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLFGX | FLRUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.11 | 1.18 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.67 | 1.65 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.23 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 1.68 | -0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.47 | 5.96 | +1.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLFGX | FLRUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 1.18 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.53 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.74 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.39 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLFGX and FLRUX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FLFGX vs. FLRUX - Dividend Comparison
FLFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.28%, more than FLRUX's 3.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLFGX Meeder Global Allocation Fund | 14.28% | 14.35% | 25.20% | 1.64% | 0.77% | 11.13% | 2.22% | 2.12% | 5.05% | 1.41% | 1.14% | 3.15% |
FLRUX Meeder Conservative Allocation Fund | 3.74% | 3.69% | 2.72% | 2.78% | 1.77% | 5.82% | 1.48% | 2.14% | 3.67% | 1.81% | 2.07% | 38.78% |
Drawdowns
FLFGX vs. FLRUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLFGX drawdown since its inception was -60.31%, which is greater than FLRUX's maximum drawdown of -52.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLFGX and FLRUX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLFGX | FLRUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.31% | -52.36% | -7.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.80% | -4.44% | -6.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.54% | -16.32% | -12.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.54% | -16.32% | -12.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.39% | -3.39% | -3.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.56% | -9.78% | -1.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 1.25% | +1.08% |
Volatility
FLFGX vs. FLRUX - Volatility Comparison
Meeder Global Allocation Fund (FLFGX) has a higher volatility of 5.87% compared to Meeder Conservative Allocation Fund (FLRUX) at 2.66%. This indicates that FLFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLFGX | FLRUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.87% | 2.66% | +3.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.24% | 3.96% | +5.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.71% | 6.11% | +9.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.14% | 6.21% | +8.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 6.92% | +6.98% |