PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLFGX vs. BOXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLFGX vs. BOXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meeder Global Allocation Fund (FLFGX) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLFGX vs. BOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FLFGX
Meeder Global Allocation Fund
-3.50%18.82%22.53%15.37%0.77%
BOXX
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
1.03%4.37%5.16%5.04%0.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLFGX achieves a -3.50% return, which is significantly lower than BOXX's 1.03% return.


FLFGX

1D
-0.34%
1M
-8.20%
YTD
-3.50%
6M
-0.81%
1Y
14.29%
3Y*
15.53%
5Y*
8.78%
10Y*
8.23%

BOXX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.03%
6M
2.13%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
4.83%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLFGX vs. BOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLFGX has a 1.81% expense ratio, which is higher than BOXX's 0.19% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FLFGX vs. BOXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLFGX
FLFGX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
FLFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FLFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

BOXX
BOXX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLFGX vs. BOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meeder Global Allocation Fund (FLFGX) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLFGXBOXXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

13.56

-12.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.40

47.23

-45.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

10.69

-9.48

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

120.87

-119.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.48

720.99

-715.51

FLFGX vs. BOXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLFGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the BOXX Sharpe Ratio of 13.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLFGX and BOXX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLFGXBOXXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

13.56

-12.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

13.15

-12.87

Correlation

The correlation between FLFGX and BOXX is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FLFGX vs. BOXX - Dividend Comparison

FLFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.67%, while BOXX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLFGX
Meeder Global Allocation Fund
14.67%14.35%25.20%1.64%0.77%11.13%2.22%2.12%5.05%1.41%1.14%3.15%
BOXX
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
0.00%0.00%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FLFGX vs. BOXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLFGX drawdown since its inception was -60.31%, which is greater than BOXX's maximum drawdown of -0.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLFGX and BOXX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLFGXBOXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.31%

-0.12%

-60.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.80%

-0.04%

-10.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.89%

0.00%

-8.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.56%

0.00%

-11.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

0.01%

+2.29%

Volatility

FLFGX vs. BOXX - Volatility Comparison

Meeder Global Allocation Fund (FLFGX) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) at 0.13%. This indicates that FLFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLFGXBOXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

0.13%

+4.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.84%

0.24%

+8.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.51%

0.32%

+15.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.09%

0.37%

+14.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.87%

0.37%

+13.50%