FLBDX vs. AFLIX
FLBDX (Meeder Tactical Income Fund) and AFLIX (Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, FLBDX returned 3.00%/yr vs 2.80%/yr for AFLIX. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FLBDX charges 1.11%/yr vs 1.39%/yr for AFLIX.
Performance
FLBDX vs. AFLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with FLBDX at 1.49% and AFLIX at 1.49%.
FLBDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 5.20%
- 3Y*
- 6.51%
- 5Y*
- 3.00%
- 10Y*
- 2.99%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.76%
AFLIX
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 3.98%
- 3Y*
- 5.66%
- 5Y*
- 2.80%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FLBDX vs. AFLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLBDX Meeder Tactical Income Fund | 1.49% | 7.28% | 6.64% | 7.10% | -5.71% | -2.01% | 7.46% | 7.24% | -1.67% | 0.60% |
AFLIX Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund | 1.49% | 5.99% | 5.51% | 7.75% | -5.69% | 1.66% | 0.58% | 1.56% | 1.70% | 1.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLBDX and AFLIX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017 | 0.25 |
Over the past year, FLBDX and AFLIX have become more correlated (0.64) than their long-term average of 0.25, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLBDX vs. AFLIX — Risk / Return Rank
FLBDX
AFLIX
FLBDX vs. AFLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meeder Tactical Income Fund (FLBDX) and Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund (AFLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLBDX | AFLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.73 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | 3.22 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.87 | 15.08 | -3.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLBDX vs. AFLIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLBDX drawdown since its inception was -8.74%, smaller than the maximum AFLIX drawdown of -9.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLBDX and AFLIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLBDX | AFLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.74% | -9.43% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.65% | -1.32% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.51% | -1.38% | -1.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.16% | -8.55% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -0.21% | -0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.92% | -1.60% | -0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.45% | 0.28% | +0.17% |
Volatility
FLBDX vs. AFLIX - Volatility Comparison
Meeder Tactical Income Fund (FLBDX) has a higher volatility of 0.51% compared to Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund (AFLIX) at 0.44%. This indicates that FLBDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLBDX | AFLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.51% | 0.44% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.92% | 1.24% | +0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.50% | 1.46% | +1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.70% | 1.98% | +0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.94% | 2.32% | +0.62% |
FLBDX vs. AFLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLBDX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is lower than AFLIX's 1.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLBDX vs. AFLIX - Dividend Comparison
FLBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, more than AFLIX's 2.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFLIX Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund | 2.20% | 3.15% | 5.97% | 5.31% | 4.13% | 2.40% | 4.51% | 2.88% | 2.92% | 1.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLBDX Meeder Tactical Income Fund | 4.38% | 4.67% | 4.35% | 3.57% | 1.68% | 1.56% | 1.81% | 2.32% | 2.03% | 2.70% | 2.90% | 2.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLBDX and AFLIX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLBDX has higher volatility (0.51%) compared to AFLIX (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLBDX dropped -8.74% vs AFLIX's -9.43%.
AFLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLBDX and AFLIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer