FLAX vs. SBIT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FLAX (Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLAX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Asia ex Japan RIC Capped Index, while SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FLAX returned 36.17% vs 98.77% for SBIT. Their -0.35 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FLAX charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.

Performance

FLAX vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLAX achieves a 18.15% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 39.44% return.

FLAX

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: -2.44%
• 6M: 10.05%
• YTD: 18.15%
• 1Y: 36.17%
• 3Y*: 19.41%
• 5Y*: 7.64%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.17%

SBIT

• 1D: 5.60%
• 1M: -6.04%
• 6M: 32.41%
• YTD: 39.44%
• 1Y: 98.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -42.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLAX Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF	$277.41K	$240.23K	$339.94K
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	$29.57M	$32.71M	$46.48M

FLAX vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FLAX Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF	18.15%	33.72%	7.29%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	39.44%	-25.11%	-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FLAX and SBIT is -0.45, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024	-0.35

Return for Risk

FLAX vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLAX

FLAX Risk / Return Rank: 64
FLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

SBIT

SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 55
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 52
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLAX vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLAX	SBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	1.27	+0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	1.95	+0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.23	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.44	2.35	+0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.72	5.19	+2.54

FLAX vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLAX and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLAX vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLAX drawdown since its inception was -42.51%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAX and SBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLAX	SBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.51%	-91.35%	+48.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.37%	-47.94%	+33.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.35%	-77.87%	+67.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.25%	-69.07%	+53.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.53%	21.67%	-17.14%

Volatility

FLAX vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) is 8.87%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 18.09%. This indicates that FLAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLAX	SBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.87%	18.09%	-9.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.67%	67.10%	-45.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.75%	88.65%	-64.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.91%	96.10%	-76.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.39%	96.10%	-75.71%

FLAX vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLAX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLAX vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

FLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, less than SBIT's 4.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FLAX Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF	2.11%	2.37%	3.12%	2.20%	2.86%	2.38%	1.57%	2.23%	2.35%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	4.03%	0.52%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLAX and SBIT in my portfolio?

FLAX and SBIT have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLAX or SBIT?

SBIT has higher volatility (18.09%) compared to FLAX (8.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLAX dropped -42.51% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

Which ETF is better, FLAX or SBIT?

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 98.77% vs 36.17% for FLAX. On fees, FLAX is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLAX has been the lower-risk option at 8.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLAX or SBIT?

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 98.77% return vs 36.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLAX or SBIT?

FLAX is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLAX or SBIT?

SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.03%, compared with 2.11% for FLAX.

What is the main difference between FLAX and SBIT?

FLAX is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. FLAX tracks FTSE Asia ex Japan RIC Capped Index, while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLAX and 0.95% for SBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.