FLAX vs. INDA
FLAX (Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF) and INDA (iShares MSCI India ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - FLAX tracks the FTSE Asia ex Japan RIC Capped Index while INDA tracks the MSCI India Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLAX returned 7.95%/yr vs 2.32%/yr for INDA. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLAX charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for INDA.
Performance
FLAX vs. INDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLAX achieves a 29.31% return, which is significantly higher than INDA's -12.38% return.
FLAX
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 10.05%
- YTD
- 29.31%
- 6M
- 32.11%
- 1Y
- 58.93%
- 3Y*
- 25.00%
- 5Y*
- 7.95%
- 10Y*
- —
INDA
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- YTD
- -12.38%
- 6M
- -11.33%
- 1Y
- -12.23%
- 3Y*
- 4.17%
- 5Y*
- 2.32%
- 10Y*
- 6.56%
FLAX vs. INDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLAX Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF | 29.31% | 33.72% | 9.82% | 6.27% | -18.88% | -3.54% | 24.17% | 17.19% | -12.02% |
INDA iShares MSCI India ETF | -12.38% | 2.68% | 8.63% | 17.16% | -8.94% | 21.36% | 14.83% | 6.49% | -1.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLAX and INDA is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2018 | 0.58 |
The correlation between FLAX and INDA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLAX vs. INDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLAX
INDA
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
FLAX
INDA
Financial Services
FLAX
INDA
Consumer Cyclical
FLAX
INDA
Industrials
FLAX
INDA
Communication Services
FLAX
INDA
Basic Materials
FLAX
INDA
Healthcare
FLAX
INDA
Energy
FLAX
INDA
Consumer Defensive
FLAX
INDA
Utilities
FLAX
INDA
Real Estate
FLAX
INDA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLAX vs. INDA — Risk / Return Rank
FLAX
INDA
FLAX vs. INDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) and iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLAX | INDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 0.87 | +0.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.56 | -0.66 | +5.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.96 | -1.59 | +19.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLAX | INDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.11 | -0.84 | +3.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.15 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.23 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
FLAX vs. INDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLAX drawdown since its inception was -42.51%, smaller than the maximum INDA drawdown of -45.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAX and INDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLAX | INDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.51% | -45.07% | +2.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.99% | -18.69% | +5.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.29% | -22.72% | +3.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.75% | -22.72% | -16.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -19.42% | +18.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.41% | -9.57% | -5.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 7.71% | -4.42% |
Volatility
FLAX vs. INDA - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) has a higher volatility of 8.58% compared to iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) at 5.26%. This indicates that FLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLAX | INDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.58% | 5.26% | +3.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.54% | 12.66% | +3.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.07% | 14.67% | +4.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 15.37% | +3.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.93% | 21.12% | -1.19% |
FLAX vs. INDA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLAX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than INDA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLAX vs. INDA - Dividend Comparison
FLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, while INDA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLAX Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF | 1.83% | 2.37% | 3.12% | 2.20% | 2.86% | 2.38% | 1.57% | 2.23% | 2.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INDA iShares MSCI India ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.76% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 6.44% | 0.27% | 0.99% | 0.94% | 1.09% | 0.90% | 1.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLAX and INDA have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLAX has higher volatility (8.58%) compared to INDA (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLAX dropped -42.51% vs INDA's -45.07%.
On 5-year performance, FLAX leads with 7.95% vs 2.32% for INDA. On fees, FLAX is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, INDA has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLAX has performed better with a 7.95% return vs 2.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLAX is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for INDA.
FLAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.00% for INDA.
FLAX tracks FTSE Asia ex Japan RIC Capped Index, while INDA tracks MSCI India Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLAX and 0.69% for INDA.
FLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLAX and INDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer