FLAU vs. YCS
FLAU (Franklin FTSE Australia ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - FLAU is a Australia Equities fund tracking the FTSE Australia RIC Capped Index, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLAU returned 7.05%/yr vs 22.90%/yr for YCS. Their -0.11 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FLAU charges 0.09%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
FLAU vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLAU achieves a 12.89% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 4.11% return.
FLAU
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 4.17%
- 6M
- 5.88%
- YTD
- 12.89%
- 1Y
- 17.47%
- 3Y*
- 13.46%
- 5Y*
- 7.05%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.95%
YCS
- 1D
- -2.97%
- 1M
- -5.17%
- 6M
- 5.08%
- YTD
- 4.11%
- 1Y
- 21.34%
- 3Y*
- 16.96%
- 5Y*
- 22.90%
- 10Y*
- 13.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $226.34K | $4.45M | $1.66M | |
| $2.37M | $2.29M | $1.56M |
FLAU vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF | 12.89% | 15.95% | 1.81% | 12.58% | -5.58% | 9.90% | 11.00% | 23.38% | -10.17% | 1.89% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 4.11% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | 29.09% | 22.38% | -11.18% | 3.37% | -1.49% | -1.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLAU and YCS is -0.30, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | -0.11 |
The correlation between FLAU and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to -0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLAU vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
FLAU
YCS
FLAU vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLAU | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.26 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 2.53 | -0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.91 | 9.53 | -4.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLAU vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLAU drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAU and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLAU | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.73% | -49.56% | +3.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.01% | -8.48% | -1.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.03% | -23.05% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.68% | -27.32% | +2.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.56% | -8.48% | +6.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.73% | -19.75% | +13.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 2.24% | +1.32% |
Volatility
FLAU vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) is 4.42%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 5.88%. This indicates that FLAU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLAU | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 5.88% | -1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.40% | 11.84% | +2.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.20% | 16.43% | +0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.66% | 21.21% | -1.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.48% | 18.61% | +4.87% |
FLAU vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLAU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLAU vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
FLAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF | 3.05% | 3.25% | 3.37% | 3.62% | 5.91% | 5.14% | 2.18% | 4.37% | 4.34% | 0.18% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLAU and YCS have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YCS has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to FLAU (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLAU dropped -45.73% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 22.90% vs 7.05% for FLAU. On fees, FLAU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLAU has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 22.90% return vs 7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLAU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
FLAU has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
FLAU is categorized as Australia Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. FLAU tracks FTSE Australia RIC Capped Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLAU and 1.00% for YCS.
YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLAU and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer