PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLAPX vs. VOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLAPX vs. VOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex Mid Cap Index Fund (FLAPX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLAPX achieves a 15.19% return, which is significantly higher than VOT's 8.39% return.


FLAPX

1D
0.37%
1M
3.60%
YTD
15.19%
6M
15.35%
1Y
28.95%
3Y*
19.67%
5Y*
9.56%
10Y*

VOT

1D
-0.83%
1M
5.62%
YTD
8.39%
6M
6.44%
1Y
11.36%
3Y*
16.24%
5Y*
6.88%
10Y*
12.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLAPX vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLAPX
Fidelity Flex Mid Cap Index Fund
15.19%14.33%15.30%17.28%-17.28%22.59%17.30%30.56%-9.10%14.01%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
8.39%10.72%16.38%23.10%-28.87%20.50%34.50%33.76%-5.56%15.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FLAPX and VOT is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2017

0.92

The correlation between FLAPX and VOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLAPX vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLAPX
FLAPX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FLAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FLAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

VOT
VOT Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLAPX vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Mid Cap Index Fund (FLAPX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLAPXVOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.13

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

0.72

+2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.10

2.14

+10.96

FLAPX vs. VOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLAPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the VOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLAPX and VOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLAPXVOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

0.72

+1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.32

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.45

+0.16

Drawdowns

FLAPX vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLAPX drawdown since its inception was -40.31%, smaller than the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAPX and VOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLAPXVOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.31%

-60.16%

+19.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-15.96%

+6.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.02%

-21.77%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.09%

-37.19%

+11.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.83%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.12%

-9.96%

+3.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

5.32%

-3.00%

Volatility

FLAPX vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Flex Mid Cap Index Fund (FLAPX) is 3.80%, while Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) has a volatility of 4.37%. This indicates that FLAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLAPXVOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

4.37%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.55%

12.36%

-0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.51%

15.81%

-0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.58%

21.36%

-2.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.95%

20.99%

-1.04%

FLAPX vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLAPX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VOT's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLAPX vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison

FLAPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLAPX
Fidelity Flex Mid Cap Index Fund
0.00%0.00%1.08%1.99%1.82%2.83%2.16%2.18%2.24%0.44%0.00%0.00%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.61%0.64%0.67%0.71%0.78%0.34%0.56%0.78%0.84%0.72%0.81%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLAPX and VOT have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOT has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to FLAPX (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLAPX dropped -40.31% vs VOT's -60.16%.

FLAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLAPX and VOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer