PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKURF vs. KCDMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FKURF vs. KCDMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fujikura Ltd (FKURF) and Kimberly-Clark de Mexico (KCDMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKURF achieves a -71.13% return, which is significantly lower than KCDMY's 5.34% return.


FKURF

1D
0.00%
1M
17.94%
6M
-72.42%
YTD
-71.13%
1Y
-40.24%
3Y*
55.74%
5Y*
10Y*

KCDMY

1D
0.18%
1M
1.93%
6M
6.34%
YTD
5.34%
1Y
22.31%
3Y*
4.47%
5Y*
12.33%
10Y*
5.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKURF vs. KCDMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FKURF
Fujikura Ltd
-71.13%147.24%480.56%-8.86%
KCDMY
Kimberly-Clark de Mexico
5.34%55.77%-28.48%6.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FKURF and KCDMY is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2023

0.06

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKURF vs. KCDMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKURF
FKURF Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FKURF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKURF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKURF Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FKURF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKURF Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

KCDMY
KCDMY Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
KCDMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KCDMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
KCDMY Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
KCDMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
KCDMY Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKURF vs. KCDMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fujikura Ltd (FKURF) and Kimberly-Clark de Mexico (KCDMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FKURFKCDMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.15

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.46

1.29

-1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.89

3.58

-4.47

FKURF vs. KCDMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKURF Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the KCDMY Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKURF and KCDMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FKURF vs. KCDMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKURF drawdown since its inception was -87.49%, which is greater than KCDMY's maximum drawdown of -74.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKURF and KCDMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKURFKCDMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.49%

-74.61%

-12.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-87.49%

-17.34%

-70.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-87.49%

-39.82%

-47.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-84.98%

-31.39%

-53.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.51%

-46.35%

+31.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

45.40%

6.24%

+39.16%

Volatility

FKURF vs. KCDMY - Volatility Comparison

Fujikura Ltd (FKURF) has a higher volatility of 42.30% compared to Kimberly-Clark de Mexico (KCDMY) at 8.16%. This indicates that FKURF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KCDMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKURFKCDMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

42.30%

8.16%

+34.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

201.05%

20.46%

+180.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

132.30%

28.22%

+104.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

95.30%

32.28%

+63.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.30%

33.92%

+61.38%

Dividends

FKURF vs. KCDMY - Dividend Comparison

FKURF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KCDMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.32%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKURF
Fujikura Ltd
0.00%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KCDMY
Kimberly-Clark de Mexico
5.32%4.82%12.08%3.96%4.24%6.72%4.70%4.08%5.16%7.20%5.68%3.98%

Financials

FKURF vs. KCDMY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fujikura Ltd and Kimberly-Clark de Mexico. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


11.00B12.00B13.00B14.00B15.00BOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
14.59B
(FKURF) Total Revenue
(KCDMY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. FKURF values in USD, KCDMY values in MXN

Frequently Asked Questions


FKURF and KCDMY have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FKURF has higher volatility (42.30%) compared to KCDMY (8.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKURF dropped -87.49% vs KCDMY's -74.61%.

KCDMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKURF and KCDMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer