PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKDNX vs. SHRAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FKDNX vs. SHRAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) and ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund (SHRAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKDNX achieves a 11.80% return, which is significantly higher than SHRAX's 2.92% return. Over the past 10 years, FKDNX has outperformed SHRAX with an annualized return of 18.13%, while SHRAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.85% annualized return.


FKDNX

1D
-0.35%
1M
3.42%
YTD
11.80%
6M
9.87%
1Y
28.24%
3Y*
25.13%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*
18.13%

SHRAX

1D
-0.01%
1M
4.96%
YTD
2.92%
6M
1.03%
1Y
10.22%
3Y*
13.92%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*
7.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKDNX vs. SHRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FKDNX
Franklin DynaTech Fund
11.80%18.59%30.57%44.42%-40.30%12.53%57.68%36.36%2.85%39.29%
SHRAX
ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund
2.92%13.50%12.02%24.09%-25.43%7.35%19.74%24.26%-7.93%14.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FKDNX and SHRAX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1990

0.83

The correlation between FKDNX and SHRAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKDNX vs. SHRAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKDNX
FKDNX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FKDNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKDNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKDNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FKDNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKDNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

SHRAX
SHRAX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
SHRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SHRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKDNX vs. SHRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) and ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund (SHRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FKDNXSHRAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.11

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

0.70

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.24

1.97

+2.28

FKDNX vs. SHRAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKDNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the SHRAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKDNX and SHRAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FKDNXSHRAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

0.60

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.16

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.38

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.46

+0.21

Drawdowns

FKDNX vs. SHRAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKDNX drawdown since its inception was -51.63%, smaller than the maximum SHRAX drawdown of -57.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKDNX and SHRAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKDNXSHRAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.63%

-57.26%

+5.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.49%

-14.59%

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.23%

-23.73%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.28%

-33.77%

-14.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.28%

-33.77%

-14.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-2.09%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.25%

-11.27%

+0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.57%

5.17%

+1.40%

Volatility

FKDNX vs. SHRAX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund (SHRAX) at 4.22%. This indicates that FKDNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKDNXSHRAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.03%

4.22%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.85%

13.14%

+2.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.41%

17.10%

+3.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.19%

20.88%

+5.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.60%

20.89%

+3.71%

FKDNX vs. SHRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKDNX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SHRAX's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

FKDNX vs. SHRAX - Dividend Comparison

FKDNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.99%, less than SHRAX's 21.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKDNX
Franklin DynaTech Fund
9.99%11.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.43%0.00%0.74%2.92%1.77%3.55%2.46%
SHRAX
ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund
21.64%22.27%20.39%13.77%15.63%26.11%18.42%12.71%18.97%5.97%4.76%4.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


FKDNX and SHRAX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FKDNX has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to SHRAX (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKDNX dropped -51.63% vs SHRAX's -57.26%.

FKDNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKDNX and SHRAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer