PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKASX vs. UMBHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FKASX vs. UMBHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund (FKASX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FKASX

1D
-0.33%
1M
4.16%
YTD
9.95%
6M
11.40%
1Y
21.79%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
1.98%
10Y*
13.51%

UMBHX

1D
-1.21%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKASX vs. UMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FKASX and UMBHX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKASX vs. UMBHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKASX
FKASX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FKASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKASX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FKASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKASX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

UMBHX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKASX vs. UMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund (FKASX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FKASXUMBHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.47

FKASX vs. UMBHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FKASXUMBHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

-20.59

+21.16

Drawdowns

FKASX vs. UMBHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKASX drawdown since its inception was -60.21%, which is greater than UMBHX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKASX and UMBHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKASXUMBHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.21%

-1.86%

-58.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.68%

-1.86%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.69%

-1.26%

-11.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

Volatility

FKASX vs. UMBHX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKASXUMBHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.09%

6.22%

+13.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.38%

6.22%

+17.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.36%

6.22%

+16.14%

FKASX vs. UMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKASX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than UMBHX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

FKASX vs. UMBHX - Dividend Comparison

FKASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.83%, while UMBHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKASX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund
18.83%20.70%11.82%0.15%0.00%8.40%0.12%0.21%6.36%6.50%0.76%8.55%
UMBHX
Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FKASX and UMBHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKASX and UMBHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer