PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FJPNX vs. MJFOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FJPNX vs. MJFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Japan Fund (FJPNX) and Matthews Japan Fund (MJFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJPNX achieves a 24.48% return, which is significantly higher than MJFOX's 16.96% return. Over the past 10 years, FJPNX has outperformed MJFOX with an annualized return of 11.47%, while MJFOX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.08% annualized return.


FJPNX

1D
-0.12%
1M
7.42%
YTD
24.48%
6M
24.89%
1Y
43.98%
3Y*
21.85%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*
11.47%

MJFOX

1D
-0.28%
1M
5.70%
YTD
16.96%
6M
18.02%
1Y
28.75%
3Y*
23.06%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*
9.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJPNX vs. MJFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FJPNX
Fidelity Japan Fund
24.48%31.66%7.37%15.86%-22.23%3.11%25.42%25.74%-14.84%29.26%
MJFOX
Matthews Japan Fund
16.96%22.72%16.31%25.79%-27.84%-5.79%29.80%26.08%-20.12%33.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FJPNX and MJFOX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1999

0.86

The correlation between FJPNX and MJFOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FJPNX vs. MJFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJPNX
FJPNX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FJPNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJPNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJPNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FJPNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJPNX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

MJFOX
MJFOX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MJFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MJFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MJFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
MJFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
MJFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJPNX vs. MJFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Japan Fund (FJPNX) and Matthews Japan Fund (MJFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FJPNXMJFOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.24

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

1.91

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.83

6.82

+6.01

FJPNX vs. MJFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJPNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the MJFOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJPNX and MJFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FJPNXMJFOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

1.27

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.42

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.48

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.37

-0.10

Drawdowns

FJPNX vs. MJFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJPNX drawdown since its inception was -64.83%, roughly equal to the maximum MJFOX drawdown of -63.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJPNX and MJFOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FJPNXMJFOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.83%

-63.52%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.74%

-14.53%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.19%

-17.14%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.23%

-42.85%

+6.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.23%

-42.85%

+6.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-0.49%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.90%

-21.26%

-3.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

4.04%

-0.70%

Volatility

FJPNX vs. MJFOX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Japan Fund (FJPNX) and Matthews Japan Fund (MJFOX) have volatilities of 5.07% and 4.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FJPNXMJFOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.07%

4.91%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.41%

17.20%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.25%

21.89%

-0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.97%

20.41%

-0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.28%

18.85%

-0.57%

FJPNX vs. MJFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJPNX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than MJFOX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FJPNX vs. MJFOX - Dividend Comparison

FJPNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.00%, more than MJFOX's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FJPNX
Fidelity Japan Fund
8.00%9.95%4.85%3.71%0.00%11.58%1.79%1.18%0.38%0.23%1.22%0.64%
MJFOX
Matthews Japan Fund
1.67%1.96%2.12%6.09%7.19%8.08%10.15%8.63%4.14%3.90%1.15%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FJPNX and MJFOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FJPNX has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to MJFOX (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJPNX dropped -64.83% vs MJFOX's -63.52%.

FJPNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FJPNX and MJFOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer