PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FJP vs. DBJP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FJP vs. DBJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FJP) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJP achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly lower than DBJP's 20.51% return. Over the past 10 years, FJP has underperformed DBJP with an annualized return of 7.48%, while DBJP has yielded a comparatively higher 16.54% annualized return.


FJP

1D
0.00%
1M
2.90%
YTD
14.28%
6M
15.85%
1Y
33.53%
3Y*
21.60%
5Y*
10.81%
10Y*
7.48%

DBJP

1D
0.81%
1M
8.88%
YTD
20.51%
6M
24.02%
1Y
52.66%
3Y*
29.04%
5Y*
21.44%
10Y*
16.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJP vs. DBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FJP
First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund
14.28%33.60%5.80%23.00%-12.83%-1.13%3.60%7.72%-18.60%27.63%
DBJP
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
20.51%29.51%25.53%36.21%-4.19%13.04%10.53%20.87%-14.82%21.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FJP and DBJP is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2011

0.71

The correlation between FJP and DBJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

FJP vs. DBJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FJP
DBJP

Industrials

45.0%
26.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.0%
12.2%

Basic Materials

9.7%
3.0%

Technology

8.9%
19.1%

Utilities

6.1%
1.1%

Financial Services

5.6%
17.5%

Energy

4.2%
1.1%

Healthcare

3.6%
6.3%

Real Estate

3.5%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
3.6%

Communication Services

0.7%
7.9%

Industrials

FJP
45.0%
DBJP
26.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FJP
12.0%
DBJP
12.2%

Basic Materials

FJP
9.7%
DBJP
3.0%

Technology

FJP
8.9%
DBJP
19.1%

Utilities

FJP
6.1%
DBJP
1.1%

Financial Services

FJP
5.6%
DBJP
17.5%

Energy

FJP
4.2%
DBJP
1.1%

Healthcare

FJP
3.6%
DBJP
6.3%

Real Estate

FJP
3.5%
DBJP
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

FJP
0.8%
DBJP
3.6%

Communication Services

FJP
0.7%
DBJP
7.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FJP vs. DBJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJP
FJP Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJP Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJP Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

DBJP
DBJP Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
DBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJP vs. DBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FJP) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FJPDBJPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.51

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

5.09

-2.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.20

19.86

-12.66

FJP vs. DBJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJP Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the DBJP Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJP and DBJP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FJPDBJPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

2.83

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

1.14

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.85

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.68

-0.36

Drawdowns

FJP vs. DBJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJP drawdown since its inception was -41.51%, which is greater than DBJP's maximum drawdown of -31.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJP and DBJP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FJPDBJPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.51%

-31.30%

-10.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.43%

-10.39%

-4.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.02%

-21.50%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.88%

-21.50%

-10.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.51%

-31.30%

-10.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.34%

0.00%

-6.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.46%

-7.29%

-4.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.67%

2.66%

+2.01%

Volatility

FJP vs. DBJP - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FJP) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) at 3.85%. This indicates that FJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FJPDBJPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.51%

3.85%

+2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.87%

13.79%

+3.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.70%

18.69%

+2.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.35%

18.93%

+1.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.88%

19.46%

-0.58%

FJP vs. DBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than DBJP's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FJP vs. DBJP - Dividend Comparison

FJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than DBJP's 2.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBJP
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
2.34%2.81%2.80%5.21%0.80%2.30%2.53%2.56%3.87%2.07%1.13%5.95%
FJP
First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund
2.49%2.68%3.18%3.49%2.21%2.43%0.99%2.80%1.54%1.29%1.46%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


FJP and DBJP have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FJP has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to DBJP (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJP dropped -41.51% vs DBJP's -31.30%.

On 10-year performance, DBJP leads with 16.54% vs 7.48% for FJP. On fees, DBJP is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DBJP has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBJP has performed better with a 16.54% return vs 7.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBJP is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FJP.

FJP has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 2.34% for DBJP.

FJP tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Japan Index, while DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FJP and 0.45% for DBJP.

DBJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FJP and DBJP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer