FJP vs. DBJP
FJP (First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund) and DBJP (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - FJP tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Japan Index while DBJP tracks the MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FJP returned 7.48%/yr vs 16.54%/yr for DBJP. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FJP charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DBJP.
Performance
FJP vs. DBJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FJP achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly lower than DBJP's 20.51% return. Over the past 10 years, FJP has underperformed DBJP with an annualized return of 7.48%, while DBJP has yielded a comparatively higher 16.54% annualized return.
FJP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- 14.28%
- 6M
- 15.85%
- 1Y
- 33.53%
- 3Y*
- 21.60%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
DBJP
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 8.88%
- YTD
- 20.51%
- 6M
- 24.02%
- 1Y
- 52.66%
- 3Y*
- 29.04%
- 5Y*
- 21.44%
- 10Y*
- 16.54%
FJP vs. DBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJP First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund | 14.28% | 33.60% | 5.80% | 23.00% | -12.83% | -1.13% | 3.60% | 7.72% | -18.60% | 27.63% |
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 20.51% | 29.51% | 25.53% | 36.21% | -4.19% | 13.04% | 10.53% | 20.87% | -14.82% | 21.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between FJP and DBJP is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2011 | 0.71 |
The correlation between FJP and DBJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
FJP vs. DBJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FJP
DBJP
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Technology
Utilities
Financial Services
Energy
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Industrials
FJP
DBJP
Consumer Cyclical
FJP
DBJP
Basic Materials
FJP
DBJP
Technology
FJP
DBJP
Utilities
FJP
DBJP
Financial Services
FJP
DBJP
Energy
FJP
DBJP
Healthcare
FJP
DBJP
Real Estate
FJP
DBJP
Consumer Defensive
FJP
DBJP
Communication Services
FJP
DBJP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FJP vs. DBJP — Risk / Return Rank
FJP
DBJP
FJP vs. DBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FJP) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FJP | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.51 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 5.09 | -2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.20 | 19.86 | -12.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FJP | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 2.83 | -1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 1.14 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.85 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.68 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
FJP vs. DBJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FJP drawdown since its inception was -41.51%, which is greater than DBJP's maximum drawdown of -31.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJP and DBJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FJP | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.51% | -31.30% | -10.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.43% | -10.39% | -4.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.02% | -21.50% | +4.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.88% | -21.50% | -10.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.51% | -31.30% | -10.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.34% | 0.00% | -6.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.46% | -7.29% | -4.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.67% | 2.66% | +2.01% |
Volatility
FJP vs. DBJP - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FJP) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) at 3.85%. This indicates that FJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FJP | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.51% | 3.85% | +2.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.87% | 13.79% | +3.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.70% | 18.69% | +2.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.35% | 18.93% | +1.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.88% | 19.46% | -0.58% |
FJP vs. DBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FJP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than DBJP's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
FJP vs. DBJP - Dividend Comparison
FJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than DBJP's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 2.34% | 2.81% | 2.80% | 5.21% | 0.80% | 2.30% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 3.87% | 2.07% | 1.13% | 5.95% |
FJP First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund | 2.49% | 2.68% | 3.18% | 3.49% | 2.21% | 2.43% | 0.99% | 2.80% | 1.54% | 1.29% | 1.46% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FJP and DBJP have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FJP has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to DBJP (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJP dropped -41.51% vs DBJP's -31.30%.
On 10-year performance, DBJP leads with 16.54% vs 7.48% for FJP. On fees, DBJP is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DBJP has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBJP has performed better with a 16.54% return vs 7.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBJP is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FJP.
FJP has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 2.34% for DBJP.
FJP tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Japan Index, while DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FJP and 0.45% for DBJP.
DBJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FJP and DBJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer