FJAPX vs. LTSTX

Last updated Jul 3, 2026

FJAPX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2015 Fund Class Z) and LTSTX (Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, FJAPX returned 3.98%/yr vs 5.22%/yr for LTSTX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FJAPX charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for LTSTX.

Performance

FJAPX vs. LTSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2015 Fund Class Z (FJAPX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJAPX achieves a 5.76% return, which is significantly higher than LTSTX's 4.47% return.

FJAPX

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: -0.42%
• 6M: 5.76%
• YTD: 5.76%
• 1Y: 11.62%
• 3Y*: 9.81%
• 5Y*: 3.98%
• 10Y*: —

LTSTX

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: -0.69%
• 6M: 4.47%
• YTD: 4.47%
• 1Y: 10.06%
• 3Y*: 11.40%
• 5Y*: 5.22%
• 10Y*: 7.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJAPX vs. LTSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FJAPX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2015 Fund Class Z	5.76%	12.78%	6.14%	11.36%	-15.00%	7.00%	12.10%	16.66%	-5.85%
LTSTX Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund	4.47%	12.16%	11.91%	13.30%	-15.23%	10.91%	13.70%	20.50%	-9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FJAPX and LTSTX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018	0.93

The correlation between FJAPX and LTSTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FJAPX vs. LTSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJAPX

FJAPX Risk / Return Rank: 68
FJAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
FJAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FJAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FJAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
FJAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

LTSTX

LTSTX Risk / Return Rank: 42
LTSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
LTSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
LTSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
LTSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
LTSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJAPX vs. LTSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2015 Fund Class Z (FJAPX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FJAPX	LTSTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	1.46	+0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	2.09	+0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.28	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	1.96	+0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.80	8.63	+2.16

FJAPX vs. LTSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJAPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the LTSTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJAPX and LTSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FJAPX vs. LTSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJAPX drawdown since its inception was -20.67%, smaller than the maximum LTSTX drawdown of -48.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJAPX and LTSTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FJAPX	LTSTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.67%	-48.17%	+27.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.68%	-5.24%	+0.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.75%	-8.12%	+1.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.67%	-21.01%	+0.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-23.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.59%	-0.69%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.33%	-6.13%	+1.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.09%	1.19%	-0.10%

Volatility

FJAPX vs. LTSTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2015 Fund Class Z (FJAPX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX) have volatilities of 2.92% and 2.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FJAPX	LTSTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.92%	2.86%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.55%	5.94%	-0.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.41%	7.05%	-0.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.74%	9.24%	-1.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.23%	9.76%	-1.53%

FJAPX vs. LTSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJAPX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than LTSTX's 0.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

FJAPX vs. LTSTX - Dividend Comparison

FJAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than LTSTX's 11.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FJAPX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2015 Fund Class Z	2.75%	2.94%	2.68%	2.75%	5.70%	7.00%	4.07%	2.67%	1.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LTSTX Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund	11.67%	12.19%	9.74%	4.26%	8.00%	7.66%	5.25%	6.91%	6.39%	4.75%	3.65%	8.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FJAPX and LTSTX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, FJAPX and LTSTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FJAPX or LTSTX?

FJAPX has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to LTSTX (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJAPX dropped -20.67% vs LTSTX's -48.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FJAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.