FJAPX vs. FRQHX
FJAPX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2015 Fund Class Z) and FRQHX (Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, FJAPX returned 4.37%/yr vs 2.97%/yr for FRQHX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FJAPX charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for FRQHX.
Performance
FJAPX vs. FRQHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FJAPX achieves a 6.38% return, which is significantly higher than FRQHX's 3.71% return.
FJAPX
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 6.38%
- 6M
- 6.49%
- 1Y
- 14.50%
- 3Y*
- 9.95%
- 5Y*
- 4.37%
- 10Y*
- —
FRQHX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 3.71%
- 6M
- 3.85%
- 1Y
- 9.62%
- 3Y*
- 7.44%
- 5Y*
- 2.97%
- 10Y*
- —
FJAPX vs. FRQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJAPX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2015 Fund Class Z | 6.38% | 12.78% | 6.14% | 11.36% | -15.00% | 7.00% | 12.10% | 5.27% |
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 | 3.71% | 10.01% | 4.68% | 8.75% | -12.22% | 4.04% | 9.80% | 3.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between FJAPX and FRQHX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019 | 0.96 |
The correlation between FJAPX and FRQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FJAPX vs. FRQHX — Risk / Return Rank
FJAPX
FRQHX
FJAPX vs. FRQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2015 Fund Class Z (FJAPX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FJAPX | FRQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.45 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 2.88 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.33 | 12.04 | +1.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FJAPX vs. FRQHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FJAPX drawdown since its inception was -20.67%, which is greater than FRQHX's maximum drawdown of -16.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJAPX and FRQHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FJAPX | FRQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.67% | -16.90% | -3.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.68% | -3.41% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.75% | -5.15% | -1.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.67% | -16.90% | -3.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.00% | -0.41% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -3.77% | -0.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.08% | 0.81% | +0.27% |
Volatility
FJAPX vs. FRQHX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2015 Fund Class Z (FJAPX) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) at 2.04%. This indicates that FJAPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FJAPX | FRQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.84% | 2.04% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.44% | 3.70% | +1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.35% | 4.36% | +1.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.72% | 5.60% | +2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.23% | 5.77% | +2.46% |
FJAPX vs. FRQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FJAPX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQHX's 0.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
FJAPX vs. FRQHX - Dividend Comparison
FJAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, less than FRQHX's 3.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJAPX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2015 Fund Class Z | 2.73% | 2.94% | 2.68% | 2.75% | 5.70% | 7.00% | 4.07% | 2.67% | 1.88% |
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 | 3.40% | 3.20% | 3.20% | 2.95% | 5.25% | 6.22% | 3.70% | 2.57% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, FJAPX and FRQHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FJAPX has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to FRQHX (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJAPX dropped -20.67% vs FRQHX's -16.90%.
FJAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FJAPX and FRQHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer