PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIXRX vs. FASGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIXRX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund (FIXRX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIXRX achieves a 4.52% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's 12.03% return. Over the past 10 years, FIXRX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 6.86%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.10% annualized return.


FIXRX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
4.52%
6M
4.60%
1Y
13.01%
3Y*
10.08%
5Y*
4.01%
10Y*
6.86%

FASGX

1D
1.23%
1M
2.18%
YTD
12.03%
6M
12.13%
1Y
26.17%
3Y*
15.73%
5Y*
8.55%
10Y*
10.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIXRX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIXRX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund
4.52%13.42%6.56%11.83%-15.65%8.00%13.10%17.51%-5.07%14.27%
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
12.03%18.23%10.81%16.45%-16.83%13.98%17.19%22.81%-7.65%17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FIXRX and FASGX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2007

0.97

The correlation between FIXRX and FASGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIXRX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIXRX
FIXRX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FIXRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIXRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIXRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FIXRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIXRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FASGX
FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIXRX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund (FIXRX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIXRXFASGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.44

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

3.27

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.12

14.11

-2.99

FIXRX vs. FASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIXRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the FASGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIXRX and FASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIXRX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIXRX drawdown since its inception was -41.29%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIXRX and FASGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIXRXFASGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.29%

-47.35%

+6.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.11%

-7.95%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.24%

-12.80%

+5.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.57%

-23.54%

+1.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.57%

-27.20%

+5.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.86%

0.00%

-1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.20%

-6.71%

+1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

1.84%

-0.65%

Volatility

FIXRX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund (FIXRX) is 2.67%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 4.68%. This indicates that FIXRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIXRXFASGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

4.68%

-2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.56%

9.32%

-3.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.61%

11.08%

-4.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.21%

12.40%

-4.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.38%

12.71%

-4.33%

FIXRX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIXRX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIXRX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

FIXRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, less than FASGX's 6.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
6.55%7.33%4.60%1.72%6.69%2.73%2.20%5.19%6.31%2.75%0.20%5.58%
FIXRX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund
3.67%2.67%2.59%2.44%4.74%5.12%3.58%3.87%7.10%24.84%2.44%4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FIXRX and FASGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FASGX has higher volatility (4.68%) compared to FIXRX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIXRX dropped -41.29% vs FASGX's -47.35%.

FASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIXRX and FASGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer