PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIXD vs. FALN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIXD vs. FALN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Smith Opportunistic Fixed Income ETF (FIXD) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIXD achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than FALN's 1.56% return.


FIXD

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.48%
YTD
0.16%
6M
-0.13%
1Y
5.61%
3Y*
3.87%
5Y*
-0.35%
10Y*

FALN

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.68%
YTD
1.56%
6M
1.36%
1Y
8.66%
3Y*
9.18%
5Y*
3.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIXD vs. FALN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIXD
First Trust Smith Opportunistic Fixed Income ETF
0.16%7.95%0.75%5.72%-15.00%-1.07%8.99%10.56%-0.00%3.50%
FALN
iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF
1.56%8.92%7.68%13.47%-13.79%5.40%14.85%17.42%-4.97%5.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FIXD and FALN is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2017

0.37

Over the past year, FIXD and FALN have become more correlated (0.67) than their long-term average of 0.37, meaning their price movements have been converging.

FIXD vs. FALN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FIXD
FALN

Utilities

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

100.0%

Technology

-

-

Utilities

FIXD
100.0%
FALN

-

Basic Materials

FIXD

-

FALN

-

Communication Services

FIXD

-

FALN

-

Consumer Cyclical

FIXD

-

FALN

-

Consumer Defensive

FIXD

-

FALN

-

Energy

FIXD

-

FALN

-

Financial Services

FIXD

-

FALN

-

Healthcare

FIXD

-

FALN

-

Industrials

FIXD

-

FALN

-

Real Estate

FIXD

-

FALN
100.0%

Technology

FIXD

-

FALN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIXD vs. FALN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIXD
FIXD Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FIXD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIXD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIXD Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FIXD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIXD Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

FALN
FALN Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FALN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FALN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FALN Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FALN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FALN Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIXD vs. FALN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Smith Opportunistic Fixed Income ETF (FIXD) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIXDFALNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.37

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

2.20

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.27

9.17

-3.90

FIXD vs. FALN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIXD Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the FALN Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIXD and FALN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIXDFALNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

1.91

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.52

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.74

-0.39

Drawdowns

FIXD vs. FALN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIXD drawdown since its inception was -20.44%, smaller than the maximum FALN drawdown of -29.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIXD and FALN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIXDFALNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.44%

-29.22%

+8.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.21%

-3.96%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.97%

-5.92%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.44%

-18.78%

-1.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.55%

-0.26%

-3.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.50%

-3.32%

-2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

0.95%

+0.12%

Volatility

FIXD vs. FALN - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Smith Opportunistic Fixed Income ETF (FIXD) has a higher volatility of 1.63% compared to iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) at 1.38%. This indicates that FIXD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FALN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIXDFALNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.63%

1.38%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.13%

3.64%

-0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.20%

4.54%

-0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.58%

7.31%

-0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.84%

8.95%

-3.11%

FIXD vs. FALN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIXD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FALN's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIXD vs. FALN - Dividend Comparison

FIXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, less than FALN's 6.46% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FALN
iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF
6.46%6.31%6.24%5.37%5.08%3.40%5.14%5.35%5.97%6.98%3.55%
FIXD
First Trust Smith Opportunistic Fixed Income ETF
4.69%4.50%4.56%3.93%3.07%1.74%3.14%5.10%2.81%1.95%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIXD and FALN have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIXD has higher volatility (1.63%) compared to FALN (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIXD dropped -20.44% vs FALN's -29.22%.

On 5-year performance, FALN leads with 3.78% vs -0.35% for FIXD. On fees, FALN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FALN has been the lower-risk option at 1.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FALN has performed better with a 3.78% return vs -0.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FALN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FIXD.

FALN has the higher dividend yield at 6.46%, compared with 4.69% for FIXD.

FIXD is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while FALN is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FIXD and 0.25% for FALN.

FALN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIXD and FALN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer